Sugar Dragon Limited SWOT Analysis

1. Introduction

In the modern business world, organizations need a strong set of strategic tools to successfully handle the complex interchange between their own strengths and weaknesses, while also addressing external opportunities and threats that they encounter. The SWOT analysis framework is a basic building block of strategic management, which helps organizations in understanding these critical factors (Lynch, 2018).

This article presents a detailed SWOT analysis of Sugar Dragon Limited. The SWOT analysis provides important insights into Sugar Dragon Limited’s existing position within the industry and possible avenues for making informed strategic decisions. The comprehensive SWOT analysis framework also helps Sugar Dragon Limited in formulating effective strategies in order to stay ahead in the competition.

2. SWOT Analysis

SWOT analysis is one of the most popular strategic management tools that business organizations have extensively employed to make key strategic decisions. The SWOT framework has four key dimensions- strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (Sarsby, 2016).

First two dimensions- strengths and weaknesses take an inward perspective to assess firms’ micro environment. Other two dimensions (opportunities and threats) take an outward perspective to understand the firm’s macro-environment. An effective implementation of this framework guides organizations about how they can leverage their strengths and overcome weaknesses to exploit external opportunities and mitigate threats (Minsky & Aron, 2021).

Explaining further, strengths are the internal organizational attributes that offer competitive advantage. Some common examples are- extensive research and development capabilities, knowledge absorption capacity, strong brand reputation, loyal customer base, and a wide distribution network (Miller, 2007).

Weaknesses are the internal organizational limitations that inhibit the firms from giving their best performance. Some examples are- outdated technology, high employee turnover, operational inefficiency, and high recruitment costs (Namugenyi, Nimmagadda & Reiners, 2019).

Opportunities are the external organizational factors that firms can exploit to achieve their desired business objectives. It may include changing consumer needs, emergence of new technologies/markets, or favorable changes in legislations.

Finally, threats are the external organizational factors that could threaten the firm performance. It could include- economic recession, rising inflation, intensifying competition, or increase in exchange rate fluctuations (Lynch, 2018).

Business organizations conduct SWOT analysis by following several steps. First, they identify strengths and weaknesses by analyzing the internal operations, resources, and capabilities. Second, they identify opportunities and threats by assessing the external market/industry dynamics (Quincy, Lu & Huang, 2012). Based on identified factors, firms take four strategic initiatives:

1. Leverage strengths to avail opportunities

2. Address weaknesses to overcome threats

3. Capitalize on strengths to mitigate threats

4. Minimize the weaknesses to exploit opportunities

Overall, the SWOT analysis is an essential tool for businesses to better understand and assess the dynamic business environment and accomplish sustainable success.

3. SWOT Analysis of Sugar Dragon Limited

The SWOT analysis can help Sugar Dragon Limited in identifying strategies that can be used to capitalize on internal strengths or capabilities, overcome weaknesses, leverage opportunities and mitigate external risks or threats (Kapoor & Kaur, 2017). SWOT analysis is conducted below for Sugar Dragon Limited:

3.1 Strengths of Sugar Dragon Limited

Key strengths of Sugar Dragon Limited are as follows:

Large product portfolio

Sugar Dragon Limited has a large product portfolio, which fulfills the varying needs/preferences of existing customers and allows Sugar Dragon Limited to expand to numerous market segments. With large product portfolio, the Sugar Dragon Limited mitigates risks due to less dependency on a single product category (Fernhaber & Patel, 2012).

Wide distribution network

The wide distribution network of Sugar Dragon Limited not only ensures efficient delivery and easy access of products to a large number of customers across different regions in a timely manner but also facilitates Sugar Dragon Limited to reduce operational cost and optimize its entire value chain.

High market share

Sugar Dragon Limited has a high market share as compared to its industry rivals. Due to its high market share, Sugar Dragon Limited effectively negotiates with suppliers on favorable terms, and it has gained economies of scale advantage and has made it difficult for possible new entrants to gain a foothold (Miller & Le Breton-Miller, 2005).

Strong brand reputation

Sugar Dragon Limited has built a strong brand reputation among customers by employing a circular economy business model and engaging in ethical and sustainable business practices. The strong brand reputation facilitates in business expansion and creates partnership opportunities for Sugar Dragon Limited (Ahmad et al. 2022).

Large R&D spending

Sugar Dragon Limited spends more than the industry average on research and development (R&D) activities. The large R&D spending facilitates Sugar Dragon Limited to build in-depth local market knowledge in different countries where it operates and develop more innovative products than rivals (Davcik et al. 2021).

High brand awareness

Sugar Dragon Limited has achieved high brand awareness through effective marketing campaigns. For instance- Sugar Dragon Limited’s active involvement with the targeted audience in industry-related events, and sponsored and community programs has contributed to strong brand awareness among customers.

Strong brand recall

Sugar Dragon Limited has developed a strong brand recall through consistent messaging, a recognizable brand logo and an attractive color scheme, store layout and product packaging. The Sugar Dragon Limited invests substantially in creative advertising campaigns that leave long-lasting impressions in customers’ minds (Keller, 2013).

High customer loyalty

Sugar Dragon Limited enjoys a high customer loyalty, which results into lower marketing costs because less effort is required to persuade already satisfied customers to make repeat purchases.The high customer loyalty makes it challenging for new entrants to attract the existing customer base of Sugar Dragon Limited (Watson et al. 2015).

User-friendly website

Sugar Dragon Limited earns a significant proportion of revenue from its online platform. It has developed a user-friendly website that offers convenience and 24/7 accessibility. It includes interactive features like live chats, surveys and contests to enhance user engagement and provide a seamless user experience (Shin, Pang & Kim, 2015).

High profitability

Sugar Dragon Limited has achieved high profitability in several past years due to its customer-centric and innovative offerings, effective pricing, and strong partnerships. Overall, the financial health of Sugar Dragon Limited is strong as compared to industry rivals.

Strong geographic presence

By tapping into diverse regions across the world, Sugar Dragon Limited enhances brand visibility and customer base. The strong geographic presence also offers opportunities to collaborate with regional or international partners, suppliers and other important stakeholders to fuel an innovation engine (Yeung & Coe, 2015).

Well-developed IT infrastructure

Sugar Dragon Limited has a well-developed IT infrastructure that automates internal activities, improves workflow efficiency and accommodates large amounts of user transactions. It protects intellectual property and confidential information, and facilitates the deployment of state-of-the-art technologies for new product lines (Jennex, Amoroso & Adelakun, 2004).

Easy access to suppliers

Sugar Dragon Limited’s easy access to suppliers facilitates with flexible sourcing, reduced lead times and just-in-time inventory management. Easy access to suppliers also allows Sugar Dragon Limited to become agile and responsive towards unforeseen disruptions and changing market trends.

3.2 Weaknesses of Sugar Dragon Limited

Key weaknesses of Sugar Dragon Limited are as follows:

High prices

Sugar Dragon Limited charges high prices on its products and services, which limits its appeal to budget-conscious customer segments. Due to increased economic uncertainty, people are becoming more price-sensitive and are actively pursuing brands that are offering products at lower prices (CANA, 2020).

Weak organizational culture

Sugar Dragon Limited has a weak organizational culture because core organizational values are not clearly defined by Sugar Dragon Limited’s management and are not widely accepted by all organizational members. Employees are not encouraged to share their inputs during an important decision-making process (Thokozani & Maseko, 2017).

Lack of workforce diversity

There is a lack of workforce diversity in Sugar Dragon Limited. Sugar Dragon Limited does not consider applications of candidates from different racial/ethnic backgrounds despite their strong profiles during the recruitment process. This results into a loss of talent (Whysall, Owtram & Brittain, 2019).

Ineffective leadership

Sugar Dragon Limited’s leadership lacks a clear vision and direction for the company. Company’s leaders possess ineffective communication and leadership skills, and do not promote diversity and inclusion. Ineffective leadership has led to low employee engagement, motivation and high staff turnover (Schyns & Schilling, 2013).

Lack of proper financial planning

Sugar Dragon Limited conducts an improper and inefficient financial planning, which leads to cash flow problems. Due to a lack of proper financial planning, Sugar Dragon Limited usually misses out on opportunities for strategic investments that could be important for organizational growth and innovation.

High job stress

Employees at Sugar Dragon Limited are experiencing high job stress due to the heavy workload. The reasons behind the heavy workload are- high customer demand, lack of delegation and staffing issues like understaffing and prolonged/unanticipated staff absences (Bakker & Demerouti, 2014).

Low employee morale

Low employee morale is another key challenge that Sugar Dragon Limited is facing. The lack of empowerment and non-recognition of individual’s efforts and achievements lowers employee morale. Limited career growth opportunities also decrease their level of motivation and morale (Gregory, 2011).

High employee turnover

Sugar Dragon Limited has a high employee turnover rate than rivals. Weak organizational culture, high work demand, lack of recognition, non-competitive basic pay and compensation packages, limited career growth and consistent work stress are some key factors that lower employees’ organizational commitment (Al Mamun & Hasan, 2017).

Supply chain inefficiencies

Sugar Dragon Limited is experiencing supply chain inefficiencies such as- overstocking and delays in the flow of goods due to inaccurate demand forecasting and ineffective communication with suppliers and partners (Whipple & Russell, 2007).

Ineffective quality control system

Sugar Dragon Limited has allocated a smaller budget to its quality control unit than industry rivals, and thus, it receives numerous customer complaints. Sugar Dragon Limited is also facing a challenge of product recalls due to its inefficient and ineffective quality control system.

Less social media presence

Sugar Dragon Limited has less social media presence or fan-following base than competitors. Nowadays, the number of social media users is significantly increasing worldwide. But, Sugar Dragon Limited focuses less on promoting products via well-known or emerging platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and Twitter (Choudhary et al. 2020).

High recruitment costs

Sugar Dragon Limited bears high recruitment costs due to frequent/high staff turnover. Sugar Dragon Limited conducts multiple series of interviews that prolongs the hiring process and requires additional resources. It has partnered with third-party agencies for the initial recruitment process, due to which it has to pay significant commissions and fees.

3.3 Opportunities for Sugar Dragon Limited

Key opportunities for Sugar Dragon Limited are as follows:

Growing population

In regions where the population is significantly growing, Sugar Dragon Limited has an opportunity to strengthen its presence and meet an increasing demand. With a growing population, the adoption of technology is substantially increasing. Sugar Dragon Limited can capitalize on this trend by expanding its online customer base.

Increased globalization

The on-going process of increased globalization offers Sugar Dragon Limited an opportunity to extend its access to the international market, embrace cultural diversity and enhance brand visibility. Increased globalization trends can also facilitate Sugar Dragon Limited to access a wider pool of resources (Mandler, Bartsch & Han, 2021).

Expansion into emerging markets

Sugar Dragon Limited has an opportunity to expand into emerging markets that hold substantial growth potential. Through expansion into emerging markets, Sugar Dragon Limited can target a large untapped customer base whose disposable income and demand for a wide range of products is increasing (Paul, 2020).

Business-friendly foreign investment regulations

Majority of emerging markets have recently introduced business-friendly foreign investment regulations. Sugar Dragon Limited can easily perform operations by tapping into such emerging markets. Business-friendly foreign investment regulations can ensure long-term growth and sustainability for Sugar Dragon Limited (Thanetsunthorn & Wuthisatian, 2023).

Strategic alliance or partnership

Sugar Dragon Limited has an opportunity to make strategic alliances or partnerships with complementary businesses. This would unlock synergies, accelerate joint innovation efforts, enhance market reach and would grant Sugar Dragon Limited access to new technological solutions. Sugar Dragon Limited can also benefit from cross-promotional opportunities (Tjemkes et al. 2017).

Merger and acquisition (M&A)

By employing a merger and acquisition (M&A) strategy, Sugar Dragon Limited can develop in-depth knowledge of local market trends and customers’ preferences. It can quickly enter and expand its reach in foreign markets where there is less brand recognition (Faulkner, Teerikangas & Joseph, 2012).

Increase in consumer spending

An increase in consumer spending in emerging economies can enhance the consumption of Sugar Dragon Limited’s products and services. With increased consumer spending, Sugar Dragon Limited can also exploit cross-selling and product portfolio diversification opportunities (Cavusgil et al. 2018).

Rise of e-commerce

The significant rise of e-commerce offers a favorable opportunity to Sugar Dragon Limited. Company can strengthen digital capabilities and access the global customer base without any physical constraints. By investing on e-commerce platforms, Sugar Dragon Limited can minimize overhead costs and offer a personalized shopping experience (Billewar et al. 2022).

Mobile-app development

Besides an online website, many international brands have now launched their own mobile application to better serve the needs and preferences of tech-savvy customers. Thus, Sugar Dragon Limited also has an opportunity to develop a user-friendly mobile app to offer a convenient shopping experience and enhance interaction with customers.

Social media influencer marketing

In today’s digital age, there is an on-going trend of social media (SM) influencer marketing. Many online users purchase products that are recommended by their favorite SM influencers. By hiring SM influencers, Sugar Dragon Limited can build trust and confidence among potential customers towards the brand (Ki et al. 2020).

Technological advancements

With increasing technological advancements, Sugar Dragon Limited has an opportunity to integrate IoT and engage in data-driven decision-making. It can enhance customer experience via AI-powered chatbots, augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies (Billewar et al. 2022).

Growing health consciousness

Due to COVID-19, health consciousness among people has grown significantly. Growing health consciousness presents an opportunity for Sugar Dragon Limited to introduce healthier and more nutritious products in its product portfolio. It can not only attract a growing customer segment but can also promote an active lifestyle (Aksoy et al. 2021).

Increasing environmental awareness

As a result of massive environmental activists’ campaigns, people are increasingly becoming aware of environmental issues. With its green products, eco-friendly packaging and sustainable business practices, Sugar Dragon Limited can appeal to environmentally-conscious potential customers (Vijai & Anitha, 2020).

3.4 Threats for Sugar Dragon Limited

Key threats for Sugar Dragon Limited are as follows:

Global political unrest

The long-standing U.S-China political disputes and on-going wars between Russia and Ukraine have created a significant global political unrest. Global political unrest may pose a threat to Sugar Dragon Limited Company’s trade activities and relationships with key international suppliers.

Economic uncertainty

Growing economic uncertainty due to COVID-19 and Omicron variants may have a long-term impact on consumers’ discretionary spending and offline buying behaviors. An increasing economic uncertainty may also disrupt global supply chains and result into lower profit margins for Sugar Dragon Limited (Vij, Kakra & Kumar, 2023).

Exchange rate fluctuations

Fluctuations in the exchange rate due to economic uncertainty may affect Sugar Dragon Limited’s manufacturing costs, pricing in foreign markets and trade operations. Exchange rate fluctuations may result into increased currency conversion costs. It can also enhance financial risks for Sugar Dragon Limited during market expansion.

Increasing taxes

Increasing taxes are posing a threat to Sugar Dragon Limited’s operational viability and financial stability. It may force Sugar Dragon Limited to reduce its budget for marketing and R&D activities. Escalating taxes may also affect Sugar Dragon Limited’s strategic investment decisions and may elevate the cost of exports/ imports.

Growing inflationary pressure

The inflation rate has risen significantly in regions where Sugar Dragon Limited operates. Consumers may seek affordable alternatives due to rising inflation, leading to a decline in the company’s sales. As a result of growing inflationary pressure, Sugar Dragon Limited may also need to raise the wage rate, which could lead to higher operational costs (Dube, 2022).

Increasing costs of inputs

Increased global economic uncertainty, exchange rate fluctuations, and supply and demand gap have led to a rise in the costs of raw materials. Technological advancements and changes in regulations related to- environmental protection, quality control and safety standards, are also increasing the costs of inputs.

Increasing competition

Increasing competition in existing market segments may threaten Sugar Dragon Limited’s leadership position and current market share. This growing competition may lead to significant price wars, lower customer switching costs and reduced profitability.

High availability of substitutes

High availability of substitutes within the industry can weaken brand loyalty and lower switching cost for Sugar Dragon Limited’s customers. It can change industry dynamics as both price-sensitive and non- price-sensitive consumers may get attracted towards easily accessible and affordable substitute products.

Shortage of skilled professionals

The shortage of skilled professionals can make it challenging for Sugar Dragon Limited to hire the right talent required for particularly technical or specialized jobs. Shortage of skilled professionals can hinder creativity and limit Sugar Dragon Limited’s ability to offer unique and high-quality products and services.

Ageing population

Ageing population threatens the Sugar Dragon Limited’s competitive positioning because the company mainly targets young customers. Older people may also have longer product lifecycles, which may ultimately affect demand for Sugar Dragon Limited’s innovative and new products and services (Rybaczewska & Sparks, 2022).

Risk of cyber-attacks

With increased digitization and technological advancements, the risk of cyber-attacks has also increased. Cyber-attack can have negative consequences for Sugar Dragon Limited, like- misuse of customer data and intellectual property theft. Company’s inability to cope with any cyber incident can lead to reputational damage, loss of customer trust and legal penalties.

Changing consumer preferences

Consumers’ interests and preferences are evolving with time. Quickly changing demand patterns are shortening the product life cycle. Sugar Dragon Limited Company’s inability to keep pace with evolving consumer needs can lower demand for its products, which may ultimately affect its competitive positioning in the market.

Stringent environmental regulations

The imposition of stringent environmental regulations presents a significant threat to Sugar Dragon Limited. Failure to comply with strict environmental laws can result in reputational risks, legal penalties, supply chain complexities and market entry barriers (Wijen & van Tulder, 2011).

4. Conclusion

The SWOT analysis of Sugar Dragon Limited offers a holistic view of the company’s strengths and weaknesses alongside external opportunities and threats. Key internal strengths of Sugar Dragon Limited include- a large product portfolio, wide distribution network, high customer loyalty, strong brand reputation and well-developed IT infrastructure etc. While, some internal weaknesses include- high prices, lack of workforce diversity, high employee turnover and supply chain inefficiencies etc. By harnessing its strengths and minimizing its weaknesses, Sugar Dragon Limited can be in a better position to leverage opportunities like expansion into emerging markets, investing on e-commerce platforms and product diversification (healthy product line) etc. However, there might be some potential dangers, such as- economic uncertainty and exchange rate fluctuations etc., that can hinder a company’s growth and long-term success.

References

Ahmad, A. M. K., Shattal, M. H. A., Rawashdeh, L. A., Ghasawneh, J., & Nusairat, N. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and brand equity of operating telecoms: brand reputation as a mediating effect. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 14(1), 78-97.

Aksoy, N. C., Kabadayi, E. T., & Alan, A. K. (2021). An unintended consequence of Covid-19: Healthy nutrition. Appetite, 166, 105430.

Al Mamun, C. A., & Hasan, M. N. (2017). Factors affecting employee turnover and sound retention strategies in business organization: A conceptual view. Problems and Perspectives in Management, (15, Iss. 1), 63-71.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job demands–resources theory. Wellbeing: A complete reference guide, 1-28.

Billewar, S. R., Jadhav, K., Sriram, V. P., Arun, D. A., Mohd Abdul, S., Gulati, K., & Bhasin, D. N. K. K. (2022). The rise of 3D E-Commerce: the online shopping gets real with virtual reality and augmented reality during COVID-19. World Journal of Engineering, 19(2), 244-253.

CANA, D. (2020). The impact of the current crisis generated by the covid-19 pandemic on consumer behavior. Studies in Business & Economics, 15(2).

Cavusgil, S. T., Deligonul, S., Kardes, I., & Cavusgil, E. (2018). Middle-class consumers in emerging markets: conceptualization, propositions, and implications for international marketers. Journal of International Marketing, 26(3), 94-108.

Choudhary, N., Gautam, C., & Arya, V. (2020). Digital marketing challenge and opportunity with reference to tiktok-a new rising social media platform. Editorial Board, 9(10), 189-197.

Davcik, N. S., Cardinali, S., Sharma, P., & Cedrola, E. (2021). Exploring the role of international R&D activities in the impact of technological and marketing capabilities on SMEs’ performance. Journal of Business Research, 128, 650-660.

Dube, K. (2022). Emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic: aviation recovery, challenges and opportunities. Aerospace, 10(1), 19.

Faulkner, D., Teerikangas, S., & Joseph, R. J. (Eds.). (2012). The handbook of mergers and acquisitions. Oxford University Press, USA.

Fernhaber, S. A., & Patel, P. C. (2012). How do young firms manage product portfolio complexity? The role of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity. Strategic management journal, 33(13), 1516-1539.

Gregory, K. (2011). The importance of employee satisfaction. The Journal of the Division of Business & Information Management, 5, 29-37.

Jennex, M. E., Amoroso, D., & Adelakun, O. (2004). E-commerce infrastructure success factors for small companies in developing economies. Electronic Commerce Research, 4, 263-286.

Kapoor, S., & Kaur, M. (2017). Basel III norms: a SWOT and TOWS approach. Vision, 21(3), 250-258.

Keller, K. L. (2013). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. In The evolution of integrated marketing communications(pp. 65-81). Routledge.

Ki, C. W. C., Cuevas, L. M., Chong, S. M., & Lim, H. (2020). Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102133.

Lynch, R. (2018). Strategic management. Pearson UK.

Mandler, T., Bartsch, F., & Han, C. M. (2021). Brand credibility and marketplace globalization: The role of perceived brand globalness and localness. Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 1559-1590.

Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business Press.

Miller, M. G. (2007). Environmental metabolomics: a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats). Journal of proteome research, 6(2), 540-545.

Minsky, L., & Aron, D. (2021). Are you doing the SWOT analysis backwards. Harvard Business Review, 21, 1-8.

Namugenyi, C., Nimmagadda, S. L., & Reiners, T. (2019). Design of a SWOT analysis model and its evaluation in diverse digital business ecosystem contexts. Procedia Computer Science, 159, 1145-1154.

Paul, J. (2020). Marketing in emerging markets: a review, theoretical synthesis and extension. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(3), 446-468.

Quincy, R., Lu, S., & Huang, C. C. (2012). SWOT Analysis. Rutgers University. Luettu.

Rybaczewska, M., & Sparks, L. (2022). Ageing consumers and e-commerce activities. Ageing & Society, 42(8), 1879-1898.

Sarsby, A. (2016). SWOT analysis. Lulu. com.

Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138-158.

Shin, W., Pang, A., & Kim, H. J. (2015). Building relationships through integrated online media: Global organizations’ use of brand web sites, Facebook, and Twitter. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(2), 184-220.

Thanetsunthorn, N., & Wuthisatian, R. (2023). Do business-friendly regulations foster corporate social performance? Evidence from 20 emerging market countries. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 34(2), 219-236.

Thokozani, S. B. M., & Maseko, B. (2017). Strong vs. weak organizational culture: Assessing the impact on employee motivation. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 7(1), 2-5.

Tjemkes, B., Vos, P., & Burgers, K. (2017). Strategic alliance management. Routledge.

Vij, P., Kakra, K., & Kumar, A. (2023). Paradigm Shift in Consumer Shopping Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Reshaping the Business World Post-COVID-19(pp. 237-256). Apple Academic Press.

Vijai, C., & Anitha, P. (2020). The importance of green marketing. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(3), 4137-4142.

Watson, G. F., Beck, J. T., Henderson, C. M., & Palmatier, R. W. (2015). Building, measuring, and profiting from customer loyalty. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 790-825.

Whipple, J. M., & Russell, D. (2007). Building supply chain collaboration: a typology of collaborative approaches. The international journal of logistics management, 18(2), 174-196.

Whysall, Z., Owtram, M., & Brittain, S. (2019). The new talent management challenges of Industry 4.0. Journal of management development, 38(2), 118-129.

Wijen, F., & van Tulder, R. (2011). Integrating environmental and international strategies in a world of regulatory turbulence. California management review, 53(4), 23-46.

Yeung, H. W. C., & Coe, N. (2015). Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic geography, 91(1), 29-58.