Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track Case Solution

The Harvard Business Review published a case study that primarily focuses on Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track. The following case solution has been designed to give the reader an overview about the business world along with a clear understanding of its growth dynamics. Recently, Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has been subjected to strategic as well as managerial problems that require immediate attention so that they can be resolved to allow future growth, expansion, and competitive edge within the marketplace. This case study solution is being written to provide a strategic solution to Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track using various appropriate tools and frameworks. Harvard Business Review’s case studies involve a central problem that is faced by a particular company. The problem identified involves strategic and managerial implications for the company. Therefore, it is important for readers to critically identify the problem Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track faces. Moreover, it is also essential to highlight the key stakeholders that are impacted and influenced by the problem identified.

External Environmental Analysis

The external environment holds significant importance for Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to ensure that the company is able to respond to all the changes in the macro-environment. This is because Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track cannot control the factors and thus can directly influence the company's operations (Indris & Primiana, 2015). The external environment of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track will be assessed using PESTLE Analysis.

Political

• A stable political environment provides a favorable market growth trend for Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track.

• It is important for Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to analyze the pressure groups, and social environment activists. The company can make close collaborations with these groups to achieve company goals (Wang, Wang, & Shi, 2022).

• High restrictions on trade and high levels of taxes can contribute to the complex business environment for Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track by impacting imports and exports.

Economic

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can benefit from wide-range opportunities in business growth by operating in developing economies (Munro, 2017).

• High GDP can determine the long-term growth strategies of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track, signaling the ability of consumers to spend on more products.

• Higher rates of interests can provide Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track with more investment opportunities.

• The flexibility in the labor market allows Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to take advantage of higher workforce productivity.

Social

• The selection of appropriate demographic segments has allowed Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to select the right segments of the market that have high growth potential.

• The research on gender roles has helped Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to develop and align communication as well as marketing strategies accordingly.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has been successful in understanding the norms and cultures of different countries by developing local teams and partnerships (Hueske, Endrikat, & Guenther, 2015).

Technological

• The adoption of innovative marketing techniques that involves communication technologies has allowed Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to collaborate successfully with consumers.

• The company has stayed ahead in the market, and can significantly increase its market share by placing its major focus on emerging technologies (Akpoviroro & Owotutu, 2018).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track should maximize its profits by investing in disruptive technologies.

Environmental

• It is crucial for Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to adopt effective waste management practices to reduce environmental pollution (J. K, W. J, & D., 2016).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track should adopt eco-friendly products to establish better relationships with the stakeholders.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can take advantage of subsidies offered in renewable technologies to achieve the long-term goal of sustainability.

Legal

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track should follow proper laws concerning employee health and safety, and anti-discrimination laws to effectively develop HRM.

• Consumer protection laws are also important for Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track as it involves the consumer protection from fraudulent marketing (S. Samusenko, S. Plaskova, & A. Prodanova, 2020).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can gain a competitive advantage, and can position itself strongly in the market by protecting intellectual property laws.

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

Threat of New Entrants

• It is difficult to achieve economies of scale in Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track’s industry, making it a weaker force for new entrants.

• There are high capital requirements in the industry. This makes it difficult for new businesses to set up their companies, and compete against Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track.

• The industry has a strong product differentiation, and heavy investment is needed for customer acquisition. Thus, Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can focus on innovation to differentiate itself from its competitors (H. Th. Bruijl, 2018).

• There are strict legal requirements to join the industry in which Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track operates, making it difficult for new entrants to enter the market.

Bargaining Power of Suppliers

• The bargaining power of suppliers in the industry is weak.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track operates in an industry with a higher number of suppliers. This means that suppliers do not have much control over their prices.

• Standardized products that have low switching costs are provided by suppliers allowing buyers like Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to easily switch their suppliers (Fabbri & F.Klapper, 2016).

• Raw materials can be purchased at lower prices by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track. The company can also switch suppliers for more reasonable pricing.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can benefit from a variety of suppliers as it can have multiple suppliers for its various geographical areas (Cho, Ke, & Han, 2019).

Bargaining Power of Buyers

• The bargaining power of buyers in the Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track industry is weak.

• There is a high product differentiation in the industry, making it difficult for buyers to switch to alternative firms.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can come with differentiated and innovative products to attract more buyers of the industry (Zhao, Zuo, & Wu, 2016).

• Buyers of this industry has low incomes. This means they prefer to purchase items at lower prices, making them more price sensitive. Organizations like Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can offer lower prices to attract customers.

Threat of Substitute Products or Services

• There are few substitute products available in the industry in which Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track operates.

• Expensive substitutes are available in the industry of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track, making it difficult for buyers to switch to those substitutes (Aithal, 2016).

Rivalry Among Existing Firms

• The rivalry among existing firms is moderate to weak.

• There are few competitors in the industry in which Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track operates.

• A large market share is enjoyed by fewer firms in the industry. This means that more competitive actions will be made to become leaders in the market (Seema, 2016).

• The industry in which Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track operates has highly differentiated products, making it difficult for companies to win each other customers.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can focus on making more differentiated products to gain a strong competitive edge in the market (Zhao, Zuo, & Wu, 2016).

Internal Environmental Analysis

Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can use internal environmental analysis to identify and evaluate the competitive positioning of a company in the business environment. This involves conducting a SWOT Analysis that can help Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to identify the company’s internal strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (Halmaghi, Iancue, & Băcilă, 2017).

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has a strong distribution network that has allowed it to make its products available to large customers within the given timeframe.

• A strong presence on social media platforms has allowed Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to have a high level of customer engagement (Rizaldi, 2015).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has been successful in building a large product portfolio, so unique and distinctive products can be offered to consumers.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has a strong brand image in the market.

• A low-cost structure of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has allowed it to manufacture products at lower costs, so they become affordable for consumers to purchase.

• The financial position of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track is strong as the company has generated higher profits over the past years (Phadermrod, M.Crowder, & B.Wills, 2019).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has invested in the training and development of its employees to keep them motivates, leading to higher efficiency and productivity.

Weaknesses

• The expenditure of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track on its research and development is comparatively less to other competitors of the market.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track uses a centralized decision-making process that takes time and reduces operational efficiency (Ahmadi, Dileepan, & K. Wheatley, 2016).

• There are high rental costs because Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track operates on more of the rental properties rather than purchasing them.

• There is no workforce diversification in Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track. This makes it difficult for the employees to adjust with the different workers who belong to different backgrounds.

Opportunities

• Since the online shopping has increased significantly, Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can take it as an opportunity to expand its online presence.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can make use of social media platforms to market its products, with more customers interactions.

• Due to more technological developments, Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can make its operations more automated so that overall company costs can be reduced (Ahmadi, Dileepan, & K. Wheatley, 2016).

• Globalization provides an opportunity to Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to expand its operations in multiple countries.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can enter in a niche market and sell distinctive products to gain a competitive advantage.

• The increase in the demand of environmentally friendly goods, Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track, can place its major focus on making such products (E.Quezada, A.Reinao, & I.Palominos, 2019).

Threats

• In recent times, there has been an increase in the bargaining power of suppliers, making it difficult for Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to buy raw materials at lower costs.

• Numerous players are entering the industry, posing a major threat to Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track.

• There has been constant pressure on Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to conduct frequent research to understand the changing customer tastes and preferences (Kolbina, 2015).

• Technological advancements require workforce training. This adds to the costs of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track.

VRIO Analysis

Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track uses VRIO Analysis to assess and evaluate the company resources to determine the competitiveness, and strategic advantage.

Valuable

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has a strong brand image and engages in corporate social responsibility.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has a high brand recognition because of the quality of products it offers to its customers (Ariyani & Daryanto, 2018).

• The distribution system of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track is valued all round the world. The company has been able to successfully establish strong relationships with its suppliers.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track focuses on continuous innovation in its business. The company has expanded this innovation in its multiple functional areas.

• There are potential growth opportunities in the market, and Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has been able to penetrate the market through its ability to raise large funds.

Rare

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track operates globally. This global presence has allowed the company to increase its customer base (Miethlich & G. Oldenburg, 2019).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has an organizational culture that promotes more teamwork, innovation, and creativity among its employees, that leads to a competitive advantage.

• Since Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has a global presence, it allows the company to easily adapt to different cultures, norms and values.

• The risk-taking ability of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track is strong. This provides more opportunities to the company to penetrate different markets.

Inimitable

• The inimitable resource for Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track is its high-quality products. These products have allowed consumers to make repeat purchases.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track operates through multiple locations of stores in different companies, allowing easy access to products.

• Strong marketing communications have been used by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to attract more customers.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has been using integrated technology that has allowed it to offer competitive pricing to its customers (Ariwibowo, Saputro, & Haryanto, 2021).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track maintains an excellent customer service that has enabled it to have a high brand engagement.

Organization

• Strong financial position has allowed Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to explore more product development opportunities.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track is successfully maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of its business operations with the help of more integrated and advanced technology.

• Employees are given both in-house and off-the-job training opportunities by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track that allow more skills development (Adnan, Abdulhamid, & Sohail, 2018).

• The strong value chain and distribution network has enabled Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to increase its revenue through the sale of its products.

Marketing Mix

Marketing Mix is needed by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to formulate effective strategies to achieve the company objectives.

Product

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has five product categories. Each of these categories has a product line that involves more variety of products (Išoraitė, 2016).

• Highly differentiated products are offered by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to its customers. These distinctive products are not easily available at competitors.

• The products of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track are of higher quality, and thus, customers pay more prices for these products.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track designs products with traditional designs giving customers more product variety.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track offers multiple sizes for its every product to make it easy for its customers to select the right product.

• Warranty and same-day delivery option if also provided by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to its customers.

Price

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track follows a competitive pricing strategy.

• To attract more customers, bundle pricing has also been used by the company.

• Little higher prices are charged for products that are sold online because of the delivery costs (Thabit & Raewf, 2018).

• Optional product pricing strategy is also adopted by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track for some of its products, such as a base product is offered for a certain price, and there are separate prices for its accessories.

• Regular promotional prices are also offered by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to its customers.

Place

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track uses two channels for its product distribution. This includes online selling and through own stores.

• There are more than multiple stores owned by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track globally. This ensures easy product availability to customers (Pogorelova, Yakhneeva, & Agafonova, 2016).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has partnered with delivery service companies to distribute its products effectively to consumers.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has also adopted an omni-channel distribution system.

Promotion

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track uses a traditional promotional strategy that involves TV advertisements (Fan, Y.K.Lau, & Zhao, 2015).

• Social media advertisements are also adopted by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to increase brand awareness.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track takes part in various events and exhibitions as a way of promoting its products.

• Large sales force is used to provide the customers with a more personal experience.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track also makes use of influencer marketing to increase the demand for its products.

• Regular content and deals are posted on the social media pages of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to attract and retain customers.

Value Chain Analysis

Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can use Value Chain Analysis to identify and assess inter-relationships as well as interdependencies.

Primary Activities

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track’s primary activities involves the production and selling of products to the final consumers (Mintz, J.Gilbride, & Lenk, 2021).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has a strong relationship with the suppliers. This ensures that the product is received, stored, and distributed in a timely manner.

• Operational activities of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track are effectively aligned.

• For inbound logistics, after the arrival of raw material, the company processes it to manufacture the final product (Hasan, Nekmahmud, & Yajuan, 2019).

• In terms of outbound logistics, Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has been able to set up optimal costs as well as efficient delivery processes to deliver the product on time.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track invests in its sales and marketing activities to build relationships with customers.

• Marketing funnel approach is used by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to effectively devise and build sales and marketing activities.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track offers both pre-sale and post-sales services to its customers.

Secondary Activities

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has an effective infrastructure that has allowed the company to successfully optimize its value chain.

• The competitive pressure in terms of employee skill development, motivation, and commitment is reduced as Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has developed a strong HRM (Linkov, Carluccio, Pritchard, & Bhreasail, 2020).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track uses a cost minimization approach to reduce its costs by analyzing the costs associated with training and hiring the employees.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track has been using integrated technology in its value chain activities. This includes technological customer support, research and data analytics concerning product design, and automated software.

• The procurement activities of Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track are effectively optimized with its inbound, outbound, and operational activities (Maheswari, Yudoko, & Adhiutama, 2019).

Market Penetration Strategies

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can increase the capacity of its production so it can reach more of the customers in its existing market.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can focus on controlling the overhead costs so that it can offer competitive pricing that can attract customers of the market (Dawes, 2018).

• Investments can be made by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track in marketing and sales activities to increase the chances of successful market penetration.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can design and develop a content that increases customer engagement within a particular marketplace.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can assess and identify more enhanced distribution networks (Radpour, Mondal, & Kumar, 2017).

• Improved distribution systems and supply chains can improve the product accessibility for the customers, making it easier for Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to penetrate the market.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can adopt price cuts in its products to compete in the market. This will give a company a competitive edge over its competitors.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can plan strategies where it can focus on acquiring the leading players of the market. Such acquisitions will give the company an opportunity to reach more customer segments.

• Strategic partnerships and joint ventures agreements can be signed by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to mitigate the risk factors, and to gain customer groups of the market.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can come up with new and innovative features in its already existing product for the market (Daouda, Barth, & T. M. Ingenbleek, 2019).

Market Development Strategies

• It is important for Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to invest in the research and development department so potential markets can be identified (Hilman, Bohari, & Abdullah, 2018).

• Regional expansion strategy can be used by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track for growth purposes. This will also take into consideration the cultural differences.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track should also consider to expand its business operations in the international market. This will allow access to a larger customer base.

• New customer groups and segments should be explored by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track should also invest in brand-building activities as it will give an opportunity to reach more potential customers (C. Koks & M. Kilika, 2016).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track should consider the market education in terms of its product. The company can significantly increase its sales by giving product awareness to new segments.

Product Development Strategies

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can come up with new improvements and modifications in the existing products to attract the market.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track should undergo the NPD process, so the company is able to assess and identify new points for its customers.

• Regular investments in the research and development will help Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track to develop something new and innovative that can give a competitive advantage (Kalogiannidis & Mavratzas, 2020).

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can develop new products by getting into more strategic partnerships.

Diversification Strategies

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can adopt vertical diversification to develop business. This can be done by adding more products to the existing portfolio (Kalogiannidis & Mavratzas, 2020).

• Horizontal integration can also be adopted by Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track, where the company can enter into a completely new product development phase that does not exist in the current product line.

• Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track can also consider to conglomerate by starting a different business.

Conclusion

Based on all the models and frameworks discussed above, it is concluded that Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track should focus on widening the existing product portfolio. Moreover, the psychological pricing strategy can be adopted. Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track should also maintain close relationships with its suppliers to benefit from lower prices. Similarly, Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track should develop more integrated outbound logistics for its perishable items. It is also important to continue producing quality and innovative products, so Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track is less affected by the new emerging competition in the industry.

References

Adnan, M., Abdulhamid, T., & Sohail, B. (2018). Predicting Firm Performance through Resource Based Framework . European Journal of Business and Management .

Ahmadi, M., Dileepan, P., & K. Wheatley, K. (2016). A SWOT analysis of big data. Journal of Education for Business , 289-294 .

Aithal, P. S. (2016). Study on Honda Performance Development CART vs IRL--Who Has the Inside Track Analysis Technique for Business Models, Business Strategies, Operating Concepts & Business Systems. International Journal in Management and Social Science, 95-115.

Akpoviroro, K. S., & Owotutu, S. O. (2018). Impact of external business enviornment on organizational performance . International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 498-505.

Ariwibowo, P., Saputro, F. B., & Haryanto, H. (2021). Analysis of Strength & Weakness, Using the Concept of Resource-Based View with the VRIO Framework in Sharia Cooperatives. Jurnal Manajemen Strategi Dan Aplikasi Bisnis, 279 - 294.

Ariyani, W., & Daryanto, A. (2018). Operationalization of Internal Analysis Using the VRIO Framework: Development of Scale for Resource and Capabilities Organization (Case Study: XYZ Company Animal Feed Business Unit). Asian Business Research Journal .

C. Koks, S., & M. Kilika, J. (2016). Towards a Theoretical Model Relating Product Development Strategy, Market Adoption and Firm Performance: A Research Agenda. Journal of Management and Strategy.

Cho, W., Ke, J.-y. F., & Han, C. (2019). An empirical examination of the use of bargaining power and its impacts on supply chain financial performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management.

Daouda, F. B., Barth, P., & T. M. Ingenbleek, P. (2019). Market Development for African Endogenous Products. Journal of Macromarketing .

Dawes, J. (2018). The Ansoff Matrix: A Legendary Tool, But with Two Logical Problems. SSRN .

E.Quezada, L., A.Reinao, E., & I.Palominos, P. (2019). Measuring Performance Using SWOT Analysis and Balanced Scorecard. Procedia Manufacturing, 786-793.

Fabbri, D., & F.Klapper, L. (2016). Bargaining power and trade credit. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66-80.

Fan, S., Y.K.Lau, R., & Zhao, J. L. (2015). Demystifying Big Data Analytics for Business Intelligence Through the Lens of Marketing Mix. Big Data Research, 28-32.

H. Th. Bruijl, G. (2018). The Relevance of Porter's Five Forces in Today's Innovative and Changing Business Environment. SSRN .

Halmaghi, E. E., Iancue, D., & Băcilă, M. L. (2017). The Organization's Internal Environment and Its Importance in the Organization's Development. International Conference Knowledge Based Organization , 378 - 381.

Hasan, M. M., Nekmahmud, M., & Yajuan, L. (2019). Green business value chain: a systematic review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 326-339.

Hilman, H., Bohari, A. M., & Abdullah, S. S. (2018). The mediating effect of cost leadership on the relationship between market penetration, market development, and firm performance. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research.

Hueske, A. K., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, E. (2015). External environment, the innovating organization, and its individuals: A multilevel model for identifying innovation barriers accounting for social uncertainties. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 45-70.

Indris, S., & Primiana, I. (2015). Internal And External Environment Analysis On The Performance Of Small And Medium Industries (Smes) In Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research .

Išoraitė, M. (2016). Marketing Mix Theoretical Aspects . International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah.

J. K, N., W. J, O., & D., K. (2016). Does External Environment Influence Organizational Performance? The Case of Kenyan State Corporations. Management and Organizational Studies.

Kalogiannidis, S., & Mavratzas, S. (2020). Impact of marketing mix strategies effective product development issues in MNCs/Retail . International Journal of Business Marketing and Management , 118-125.

Kolbina, O. (2015). SWOT Analysis as a Strategic Planning Tool for Companies in the Food Industry. Problems of Economic Transition, 74-83 .

Linkov, I., Carluccio, S., Pritchard, O., & Bhreasail, Á. N. (2020). The case for value chain resilience. Management Research Review.

Maheswari, H., Yudoko, G., & Adhiutama, A. (2019). Government and Intermediary Business Engagement for Controlling Electronic Waste in Indonesia: A Sustainable Reverse Logistics Theory through Customer Value Chain Analysis. Sustainability.

Miethlich, B., & G. Oldenburg, A. (2019). The Employment of Persons with Disabilities as a Strategic Asset: A Resource-Based-View using the Value-Rarity-Imitability-Organization(VRIO) Framework . Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business and Economics.

Mintz, O., J.Gilbride, T., & Lenk, P. (2021). The right metrics for marketing-mix decisions. International Journal of Research in Marketing , 32-49.

Munro, M. M. (2017). Analyzing external environment factors affecting social enterprise development. Social Enterprise Journal, 38-52.

Phadermrod, B., M.Crowder, R., & B.Wills, G. (2019). Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 194-203.

Pogorelova, E., Yakhneeva, I., & Agafonova, A. (2016). Marketing Mix for E-Commerce. International Journal of Enviornmental & Science Education .

Radpour, S., Mondal, M. A., & Kumar, A. (2017). Market penetration modeling of high energy efficiency appliances in the residential sector. Energy, 951-961.

Rizaldi, A. (2015). Control Environment Analysis at Government Internal Control System: Indonesia Case. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 844-850.

S. Samusenko, A., S. Plaskova, N., & A. Prodanova, N. (2020). The Analysis of the External Environment to Determine the Practical Focus of Applied Research and Development in the Framework of Innovation. Complex Systems: Innovation and Sustainability in the Digital Age , 245–255.

Seema, S. (2016). Porter's Model: A Critical Examination . International Journal of Engineering and Management Research .

Thabit, T., & Raewf, M. (2018). The Evaluation of Marketing Mix Elements: A Case Study. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies.

Wang, L., Wang, Y., & Shi, L. (2022). Analysis of risky driving behaviors among bus drivers in China: The role of enterprise management, external environment and attitudes towards traffic safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention.

Zhao, Z. Y., Zuo, J., & Wu, P. H. (2016). Competitiveness assessment of the biomass power generation industry in China: A five forces model study. Renewable Energy, 144-153.