BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL Case Solution

The Harvard Business Review published a case study that primarily focuses on BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL. The following case solution has been designed to give the reader an overview about the business world along with a clear understanding of its growth dynamics. Recently, BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has been subjected to strategic as well as managerial problems that require immediate attention so that they can be resolved to allow future growth, expansion, and competitive edge within the marketplace. This case study solution is being written to provide a strategic solution to BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL using various appropriate tools and frameworks. Harvard Business Review’s case studies involve a central problem that is faced by a particular company. The problem identified involves strategic and managerial implications for the company. Therefore, it is important for readers to critically identify the problem BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL faces. Moreover, it is also essential to highlight the key stakeholders that are impacted and influenced by the problem identified.

External Environmental Analysis

The external environment holds significant importance for BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to ensure that the company is able to respond to all the changes in the macro-environment. This is because BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL cannot control the factors and thus can directly influence the company's operations (Indris & Primiana, 2015). The external environment of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL will be assessed using PESTLE Analysis.

Political

• A stable political environment provides a favorable market growth trend for BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL.

• It is important for BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to analyze the pressure groups, and social environment activists. The company can make close collaborations with these groups to achieve company goals (Wang, Wang, & Shi, 2022).

• High restrictions on trade and high levels of taxes can contribute to the complex business environment for BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL by impacting imports and exports.

Economic

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can benefit from wide-range opportunities in business growth by operating in developing economies (Munro, 2017).

• High GDP can determine the long-term growth strategies of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, signaling the ability of consumers to spend on more products.

• Higher rates of interests can provide BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL with more investment opportunities.

• The flexibility in the labor market allows BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to take advantage of higher workforce productivity.

Social

• The selection of appropriate demographic segments has allowed BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to select the right segments of the market that have high growth potential.

• The research on gender roles has helped BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to develop and align communication as well as marketing strategies accordingly.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has been successful in understanding the norms and cultures of different countries by developing local teams and partnerships (Hueske, Endrikat, & Guenther, 2015).

Technological

• The adoption of innovative marketing techniques that involves communication technologies has allowed BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to collaborate successfully with consumers.

• The company has stayed ahead in the market, and can significantly increase its market share by placing its major focus on emerging technologies (Akpoviroro & Owotutu, 2018).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL should maximize its profits by investing in disruptive technologies.

Environmental

• It is crucial for BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to adopt effective waste management practices to reduce environmental pollution (J. K, W. J, & D., 2016).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL should adopt eco-friendly products to establish better relationships with the stakeholders.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can take advantage of subsidies offered in renewable technologies to achieve the long-term goal of sustainability.

Legal

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL should follow proper laws concerning employee health and safety, and anti-discrimination laws to effectively develop HRM.

• Consumer protection laws are also important for BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL as it involves the consumer protection from fraudulent marketing (S. Samusenko, S. Plaskova, & A. Prodanova, 2020).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can gain a competitive advantage, and can position itself strongly in the market by protecting intellectual property laws.

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

Threat of New Entrants

• It is difficult to achieve economies of scale in BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL’s industry, making it a weaker force for new entrants.

• There are high capital requirements in the industry. This makes it difficult for new businesses to set up their companies, and compete against BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL.

• The industry has a strong product differentiation, and heavy investment is needed for customer acquisition. Thus, BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can focus on innovation to differentiate itself from its competitors (H. Th. Bruijl, 2018).

• There are strict legal requirements to join the industry in which BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL operates, making it difficult for new entrants to enter the market.

Bargaining Power of Suppliers

• The bargaining power of suppliers in the industry is weak.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL operates in an industry with a higher number of suppliers. This means that suppliers do not have much control over their prices.

• Standardized products that have low switching costs are provided by suppliers allowing buyers like BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to easily switch their suppliers (Fabbri & F.Klapper, 2016).

• Raw materials can be purchased at lower prices by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL. The company can also switch suppliers for more reasonable pricing.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can benefit from a variety of suppliers as it can have multiple suppliers for its various geographical areas (Cho, Ke, & Han, 2019).

Bargaining Power of Buyers

• The bargaining power of buyers in the BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL industry is weak.

• There is a high product differentiation in the industry, making it difficult for buyers to switch to alternative firms.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can come with differentiated and innovative products to attract more buyers of the industry (Zhao, Zuo, & Wu, 2016).

• Buyers of this industry has low incomes. This means they prefer to purchase items at lower prices, making them more price sensitive. Organizations like BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can offer lower prices to attract customers.

Threat of Substitute Products or Services

• There are few substitute products available in the industry in which BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL operates.

• Expensive substitutes are available in the industry of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, making it difficult for buyers to switch to those substitutes (Aithal, 2016).

Rivalry Among Existing Firms

• The rivalry among existing firms is moderate to weak.

• There are few competitors in the industry in which BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL operates.

• A large market share is enjoyed by fewer firms in the industry. This means that more competitive actions will be made to become leaders in the market (Seema, 2016).

• The industry in which BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL operates has highly differentiated products, making it difficult for companies to win each other customers.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can focus on making more differentiated products to gain a strong competitive edge in the market (Zhao, Zuo, & Wu, 2016).

Internal Environmental Analysis

BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can use internal environmental analysis to identify and evaluate the competitive positioning of a company in the business environment. This involves conducting a SWOT Analysis that can help BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to identify the company’s internal strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (Halmaghi, Iancue, & Băcilă, 2017).

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has a strong distribution network that has allowed it to make its products available to large customers within the given timeframe.

• A strong presence on social media platforms has allowed BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to have a high level of customer engagement (Rizaldi, 2015).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has been successful in building a large product portfolio, so unique and distinctive products can be offered to consumers.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has a strong brand image in the market.

• A low-cost structure of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has allowed it to manufacture products at lower costs, so they become affordable for consumers to purchase.

• The financial position of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL is strong as the company has generated higher profits over the past years (Phadermrod, M.Crowder, & B.Wills, 2019).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has invested in the training and development of its employees to keep them motivates, leading to higher efficiency and productivity.

Weaknesses

• The expenditure of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL on its research and development is comparatively less to other competitors of the market.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL uses a centralized decision-making process that takes time and reduces operational efficiency (Ahmadi, Dileepan, & K. Wheatley, 2016).

• There are high rental costs because BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL operates on more of the rental properties rather than purchasing them.

• There is no workforce diversification in BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL. This makes it difficult for the employees to adjust with the different workers who belong to different backgrounds.

Opportunities

• Since the online shopping has increased significantly, BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can take it as an opportunity to expand its online presence.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can make use of social media platforms to market its products, with more customers interactions.

• Due to more technological developments, BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can make its operations more automated so that overall company costs can be reduced (Ahmadi, Dileepan, & K. Wheatley, 2016).

• Globalization provides an opportunity to BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to expand its operations in multiple countries.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can enter in a niche market and sell distinctive products to gain a competitive advantage.

• The increase in the demand of environmentally friendly goods, BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, can place its major focus on making such products (E.Quezada, A.Reinao, & I.Palominos, 2019).

Threats

• In recent times, there has been an increase in the bargaining power of suppliers, making it difficult for BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to buy raw materials at lower costs.

• Numerous players are entering the industry, posing a major threat to BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL.

• There has been constant pressure on BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to conduct frequent research to understand the changing customer tastes and preferences (Kolbina, 2015).

• Technological advancements require workforce training. This adds to the costs of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL.

VRIO Analysis

BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL uses VRIO Analysis to assess and evaluate the company resources to determine the competitiveness, and strategic advantage.

Valuable

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has a strong brand image and engages in corporate social responsibility.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has a high brand recognition because of the quality of products it offers to its customers (Ariyani & Daryanto, 2018).

• The distribution system of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL is valued all round the world. The company has been able to successfully establish strong relationships with its suppliers.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL focuses on continuous innovation in its business. The company has expanded this innovation in its multiple functional areas.

• There are potential growth opportunities in the market, and BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has been able to penetrate the market through its ability to raise large funds.

Rare

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL operates globally. This global presence has allowed the company to increase its customer base (Miethlich & G. Oldenburg, 2019).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has an organizational culture that promotes more teamwork, innovation, and creativity among its employees, that leads to a competitive advantage.

• Since BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has a global presence, it allows the company to easily adapt to different cultures, norms and values.

• The risk-taking ability of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL is strong. This provides more opportunities to the company to penetrate different markets.

Inimitable

• The inimitable resource for BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL is its high-quality products. These products have allowed consumers to make repeat purchases.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL operates through multiple locations of stores in different companies, allowing easy access to products.

• Strong marketing communications have been used by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to attract more customers.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has been using integrated technology that has allowed it to offer competitive pricing to its customers (Ariwibowo, Saputro, & Haryanto, 2021).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL maintains an excellent customer service that has enabled it to have a high brand engagement.

Organization

• Strong financial position has allowed BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to explore more product development opportunities.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL is successfully maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of its business operations with the help of more integrated and advanced technology.

• Employees are given both in-house and off-the-job training opportunities by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL that allow more skills development (Adnan, Abdulhamid, & Sohail, 2018).

• The strong value chain and distribution network has enabled BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to increase its revenue through the sale of its products.

Marketing Mix

Marketing Mix is needed by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to formulate effective strategies to achieve the company objectives.

Product

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has five product categories. Each of these categories has a product line that involves more variety of products (Išoraitė, 2016).

• Highly differentiated products are offered by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to its customers. These distinctive products are not easily available at competitors.

• The products of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL are of higher quality, and thus, customers pay more prices for these products.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL designs products with traditional designs giving customers more product variety.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL offers multiple sizes for its every product to make it easy for its customers to select the right product.

• Warranty and same-day delivery option if also provided by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to its customers.

Price

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL follows a competitive pricing strategy.

• To attract more customers, bundle pricing has also been used by the company.

• Little higher prices are charged for products that are sold online because of the delivery costs (Thabit & Raewf, 2018).

• Optional product pricing strategy is also adopted by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL for some of its products, such as a base product is offered for a certain price, and there are separate prices for its accessories.

• Regular promotional prices are also offered by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to its customers.

Place

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL uses two channels for its product distribution. This includes online selling and through own stores.

• There are more than multiple stores owned by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL globally. This ensures easy product availability to customers (Pogorelova, Yakhneeva, & Agafonova, 2016).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has partnered with delivery service companies to distribute its products effectively to consumers.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has also adopted an omni-channel distribution system.

Promotion

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL uses a traditional promotional strategy that involves TV advertisements (Fan, Y.K.Lau, & Zhao, 2015).

• Social media advertisements are also adopted by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to increase brand awareness.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL takes part in various events and exhibitions as a way of promoting its products.

• Large sales force is used to provide the customers with a more personal experience.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL also makes use of influencer marketing to increase the demand for its products.

• Regular content and deals are posted on the social media pages of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to attract and retain customers.

Value Chain Analysis

BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can use Value Chain Analysis to identify and assess inter-relationships as well as interdependencies.

Primary Activities

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL’s primary activities involves the production and selling of products to the final consumers (Mintz, J.Gilbride, & Lenk, 2021).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has a strong relationship with the suppliers. This ensures that the product is received, stored, and distributed in a timely manner.

• Operational activities of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL are effectively aligned.

• For inbound logistics, after the arrival of raw material, the company processes it to manufacture the final product (Hasan, Nekmahmud, & Yajuan, 2019).

• In terms of outbound logistics, BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has been able to set up optimal costs as well as efficient delivery processes to deliver the product on time.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL invests in its sales and marketing activities to build relationships with customers.

• Marketing funnel approach is used by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to effectively devise and build sales and marketing activities.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL offers both pre-sale and post-sales services to its customers.

Secondary Activities

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has an effective infrastructure that has allowed the company to successfully optimize its value chain.

• The competitive pressure in terms of employee skill development, motivation, and commitment is reduced as BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has developed a strong HRM (Linkov, Carluccio, Pritchard, & Bhreasail, 2020).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL uses a cost minimization approach to reduce its costs by analyzing the costs associated with training and hiring the employees.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL has been using integrated technology in its value chain activities. This includes technological customer support, research and data analytics concerning product design, and automated software.

• The procurement activities of BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL are effectively optimized with its inbound, outbound, and operational activities (Maheswari, Yudoko, & Adhiutama, 2019).

Market Penetration Strategies

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can increase the capacity of its production so it can reach more of the customers in its existing market.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can focus on controlling the overhead costs so that it can offer competitive pricing that can attract customers of the market (Dawes, 2018).

• Investments can be made by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL in marketing and sales activities to increase the chances of successful market penetration.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can design and develop a content that increases customer engagement within a particular marketplace.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can assess and identify more enhanced distribution networks (Radpour, Mondal, & Kumar, 2017).

• Improved distribution systems and supply chains can improve the product accessibility for the customers, making it easier for BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to penetrate the market.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can adopt price cuts in its products to compete in the market. This will give a company a competitive edge over its competitors.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can plan strategies where it can focus on acquiring the leading players of the market. Such acquisitions will give the company an opportunity to reach more customer segments.

• Strategic partnerships and joint ventures agreements can be signed by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to mitigate the risk factors, and to gain customer groups of the market.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can come up with new and innovative features in its already existing product for the market (Daouda, Barth, & T. M. Ingenbleek, 2019).

Market Development Strategies

• It is important for BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to invest in the research and development department so potential markets can be identified (Hilman, Bohari, & Abdullah, 2018).

• Regional expansion strategy can be used by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL for growth purposes. This will also take into consideration the cultural differences.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL should also consider to expand its business operations in the international market. This will allow access to a larger customer base.

• New customer groups and segments should be explored by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL should also invest in brand-building activities as it will give an opportunity to reach more potential customers (C. Koks & M. Kilika, 2016).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL should consider the market education in terms of its product. The company can significantly increase its sales by giving product awareness to new segments.

Product Development Strategies

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can come up with new improvements and modifications in the existing products to attract the market.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL should undergo the NPD process, so the company is able to assess and identify new points for its customers.

• Regular investments in the research and development will help BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL to develop something new and innovative that can give a competitive advantage (Kalogiannidis & Mavratzas, 2020).

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can develop new products by getting into more strategic partnerships.

Diversification Strategies

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can adopt vertical diversification to develop business. This can be done by adding more products to the existing portfolio (Kalogiannidis & Mavratzas, 2020).

• Horizontal integration can also be adopted by BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, where the company can enter into a completely new product development phase that does not exist in the current product line.

• BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL can also consider to conglomerate by starting a different business.

Conclusion

Based on all the models and frameworks discussed above, it is concluded that BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL should focus on widening the existing product portfolio. Moreover, the psychological pricing strategy can be adopted. BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL should also maintain close relationships with its suppliers to benefit from lower prices. Similarly, BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL should develop more integrated outbound logistics for its perishable items. It is also important to continue producing quality and innovative products, so BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL is less affected by the new emerging competition in the industry.

References

Adnan, M., Abdulhamid, T., & Sohail, B. (2018). Predicting Firm Performance through Resource Based Framework . European Journal of Business and Management .

Ahmadi, M., Dileepan, P., & K. Wheatley, K. (2016). A SWOT analysis of big data. Journal of Education for Business , 289-294 .

Aithal, P. S. (2016). Study on BRAND EQUITY CAPITALIZING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL Analysis Technique for Business Models, Business Strategies, Operating Concepts & Business Systems. International Journal in Management and Social Science, 95-115.

Akpoviroro, K. S., & Owotutu, S. O. (2018). Impact of external business enviornment on organizational performance . International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 498-505.

Ariwibowo, P., Saputro, F. B., & Haryanto, H. (2021). Analysis of Strength & Weakness, Using the Concept of Resource-Based View with the VRIO Framework in Sharia Cooperatives. Jurnal Manajemen Strategi Dan Aplikasi Bisnis, 279 - 294.

Ariyani, W., & Daryanto, A. (2018). Operationalization of Internal Analysis Using the VRIO Framework: Development of Scale for Resource and Capabilities Organization (Case Study: XYZ Company Animal Feed Business Unit). Asian Business Research Journal .

C. Koks, S., & M. Kilika, J. (2016). Towards a Theoretical Model Relating Product Development Strategy, Market Adoption and Firm Performance: A Research Agenda. Journal of Management and Strategy.

Cho, W., Ke, J.-y. F., & Han, C. (2019). An empirical examination of the use of bargaining power and its impacts on supply chain financial performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management.

Daouda, F. B., Barth, P., & T. M. Ingenbleek, P. (2019). Market Development for African Endogenous Products. Journal of Macromarketing .

Dawes, J. (2018). The Ansoff Matrix: A Legendary Tool, But with Two Logical Problems. SSRN .

E.Quezada, L., A.Reinao, E., & I.Palominos, P. (2019). Measuring Performance Using SWOT Analysis and Balanced Scorecard. Procedia Manufacturing, 786-793.

Fabbri, D., & F.Klapper, L. (2016). Bargaining power and trade credit. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66-80.

Fan, S., Y.K.Lau, R., & Zhao, J. L. (2015). Demystifying Big Data Analytics for Business Intelligence Through the Lens of Marketing Mix. Big Data Research, 28-32.

H. Th. Bruijl, G. (2018). The Relevance of Porter's Five Forces in Today's Innovative and Changing Business Environment. SSRN .

Halmaghi, E. E., Iancue, D., & Băcilă, M. L. (2017). The Organization's Internal Environment and Its Importance in the Organization's Development. International Conference Knowledge Based Organization , 378 - 381.

Hasan, M. M., Nekmahmud, M., & Yajuan, L. (2019). Green business value chain: a systematic review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 326-339.

Hilman, H., Bohari, A. M., & Abdullah, S. S. (2018). The mediating effect of cost leadership on the relationship between market penetration, market development, and firm performance. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research.

Hueske, A. K., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, E. (2015). External environment, the innovating organization, and its individuals: A multilevel model for identifying innovation barriers accounting for social uncertainties. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 45-70.

Indris, S., & Primiana, I. (2015). Internal And External Environment Analysis On The Performance Of Small And Medium Industries (Smes) In Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research .

Išoraitė, M. (2016). Marketing Mix Theoretical Aspects . International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah.

J. K, N., W. J, O., & D., K. (2016). Does External Environment Influence Organizational Performance? The Case of Kenyan State Corporations. Management and Organizational Studies.

Kalogiannidis, S., & Mavratzas, S. (2020). Impact of marketing mix strategies effective product development issues in MNCs/Retail . International Journal of Business Marketing and Management , 118-125.

Kolbina, O. (2015). SWOT Analysis as a Strategic Planning Tool for Companies in the Food Industry. Problems of Economic Transition, 74-83 .

Linkov, I., Carluccio, S., Pritchard, O., & Bhreasail, Á. N. (2020). The case for value chain resilience. Management Research Review.

Maheswari, H., Yudoko, G., & Adhiutama, A. (2019). Government and Intermediary Business Engagement for Controlling Electronic Waste in Indonesia: A Sustainable Reverse Logistics Theory through Customer Value Chain Analysis. Sustainability.

Miethlich, B., & G. Oldenburg, A. (2019). The Employment of Persons with Disabilities as a Strategic Asset: A Resource-Based-View using the Value-Rarity-Imitability-Organization(VRIO) Framework . Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business and Economics.

Mintz, O., J.Gilbride, T., & Lenk, P. (2021). The right metrics for marketing-mix decisions. International Journal of Research in Marketing , 32-49.

Munro, M. M. (2017). Analyzing external environment factors affecting social enterprise development. Social Enterprise Journal, 38-52.

Phadermrod, B., M.Crowder, R., & B.Wills, G. (2019). Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 194-203.

Pogorelova, E., Yakhneeva, I., & Agafonova, A. (2016). Marketing Mix for E-Commerce. International Journal of Enviornmental & Science Education .

Radpour, S., Mondal, M. A., & Kumar, A. (2017). Market penetration modeling of high energy efficiency appliances in the residential sector. Energy, 951-961.

Rizaldi, A. (2015). Control Environment Analysis at Government Internal Control System: Indonesia Case. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 844-850.

S. Samusenko, A., S. Plaskova, N., & A. Prodanova, N. (2020). The Analysis of the External Environment to Determine the Practical Focus of Applied Research and Development in the Framework of Innovation. Complex Systems: Innovation and Sustainability in the Digital Age , 245–255.

Seema, S. (2016). Porter's Model: A Critical Examination . International Journal of Engineering and Management Research .

Thabit, T., & Raewf, M. (2018). The Evaluation of Marketing Mix Elements: A Case Study. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies.

Wang, L., Wang, Y., & Shi, L. (2022). Analysis of risky driving behaviors among bus drivers in China: The role of enterprise management, external environment and attitudes towards traffic safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention.

Zhao, Z. Y., Zuo, J., & Wu, P. H. (2016). Competitiveness assessment of the biomass power generation industry in China: A five forces model study. Renewable Energy, 144-153.