Blue Ocean Strategy of Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect

Introduction

The blue ocean strategy refers to a situation or a market where there is no irrelevant competition, or where there is negligible competition. The blue ocean strategy of Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect is focused on searching for new markets and business avenues which operate with minimal pricing pressures. The blue ocean strategy can be applied across different sectors and industries, and the businesses that exist within them. Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect blue ocean strategy is pivoted on entering new market spaces, or developing them as well as on innovation focused internally or externally that helps reinvent the industry to ensure no irrelevant competition (Kim & Mauborgne, 2014).

Moving away from saturated markets

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect continues to operate in saturated market spaces, and is restricted in growth and expansion. The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect’s businesses often face hurdles in the way of development and are also faced with increasingly intense pricing pressures- and are thus said to operate in a red ocean. A red ocean is marked with cut-throat competition and pricing wars that compromise the profits for all players. Pressures in saturated markets along with narrow growth spaces had forced the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect to search for new avenues – vertically or horizontally – to be able to enjoy higher market shares, and swim in blue oceans (Kim & Mauborgne, 2014).

Blue ocean strategy and differentiation

New industry boundaries

As companies and organizations move towards blue oceans, they redraw and redesign industry boundaries. This is possible through innovation and creativity. The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect also explores new platforms and channels, as well as means of doing business and is thus able to expand existing industry boundaries. The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has also been able to show the potential of developing new industries through its innovations – by identifying new spaces and making the competition irrelevant (Agnihotri, 2016).

Differentiation

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has focused on differentiation under the blue ocean strategy. The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect’s efforts towards differentiation are focused on creating unique value for the customers in its product and service offerings (Agnihotri, 2016; Blue Ocean Strategy, 2022).

Cost efficiencies and low cost

Under blue oceans, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect also focuses on maintaining affordability for the value additions and differentiated products and services that it offers. The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect commonly continuously reevaluates and reassesses its own processes and systems to maintain high-cost efficiencies (Freedman, 2022).

Value innovation – value addition and low-cost maintenance

In doing so, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to explore blue oceans through value additions as well as affordability for consumers. The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to successfully identify what consumer’s value and include it in its offerings and value propositions. At the same time, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to provide the value differentiation at affordable costs. In this manner, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect enjoys high levels of value innovation (Kim, 2002; Kim & Mauborgne, 2014).

Understanding red oceans

Under red oceans, where the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect previously operated, all layers had accepted the predefined structures and boundaries of the industry, and had continued to operate as well as compete within these (The Economic Times, 2022).

Cut throat competition

To be able to remain profitable and successful, players, including the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect within red oceans, focused efforts on developing and maintaining competitive advantages over one another, and other players. This advantage was largely cost-based, as in the case of the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect. In this way, wealth was only redistributed at the expense of other players, and the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect failed to create any new wealth in the red oceans (Kim & Mauborgne, 2005).

Understanding blue oceans

Under the blue ocean strategy, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect operates in an industry and market space that is not marked with set boundaries or structures. These blue ocean structures have been recreated by the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect at large, as well as by other players. Other players have also contributed to the restructuring of the industry through innovation (Kim & Mauborgne, 2014).

Restructuring industrial boundaries under the blue ocean strategy

Under the blue ocean strategy, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect is not restricted by predefined rules, barriers, and principles. Instead, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to shift its strategic direction and attention from focusing on supply towards working on developing and creating demand (Blue Ocean Strategy, 2022). The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect, in this manner, is focused on the building of value innovation in its offerings, along with ensuring efforts towards building and maintaining differentiation and cost-effectiveness. In this way, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to immaterialize the competition (Kim & Mauborgne, 2017).

Strategic directions for blue oceans

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has four different strategic directions, which it can choose from four continuing to pursue its blue ocean strategy. All of these strategic directions will strengthen the company’s current business position and will supports its strategy of value addition and cost efficiencies, as well as differentiation – allowing it to develop strong and sustainable market positions. These directions are

Raise

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect should assess and evaluate the current industry standards and practices.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect should identify loopholes, and areas which can be improved, expanded upon, or developed a new within the industry.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect should identify different drivers and factors within the industry boundaries.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect should identify through research and observation the different factors that could raise above the existing industry standards (Kim, 2002; Kim & Mauborgne, 2017).

Eliminate

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect should assess and observe current industry standards.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect should observe players’ practices within the industry, and relate the same with the industry standards.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect can identify the standards which are not needed, which are obsolete, and which may slow down operations and processes.

• These standards can be eliminated in own operations by the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect (Kim & Mauborgne, 2014; Freedman, 2022).

Reduce

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect can also assess an observe industry standards for identifying factors that are not needed, or needed partially.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect can work on reducing these standards to enhance operational performance and maximum utilization of resources as well as value addition (The Economic Times, 2022; Kim & Mauborgne, 2014).

Created

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect can also expand current industry boundaries and standards.

• This expansion will be possible by the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect through expanding and creating new standards.

• The new standards can be created by the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect through observing industry processes and operations, and identifying potential loopholes.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect can introduce new processes and standards to redesign industry boundaries (Agnihotri, 2016; Kim & Mauborgne, 2005).

Blue ocean strategy: organizational competencies

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to successfully implement the blue ocean strategy because of three important organizational elements (Freedman, 2022). These organizational elements have allowed the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect to explore blue oceans, experiment successfully with innovation, and add value to its product offerings. These elements include the following:

Mindset

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has a progressive mindset that is rooted in this participative and visionary leadership (Bratton, 2020).

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has a positive and can-do attitude and mindset.

• This mindset has allowed the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect to achieve success through high focus and efforts (Wilson, 2018).

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has high motivation levels of employees – which enhances the optimal performance of the organization and has allowed it to explore Blue Ocean through creativity (Kim & Mauborgne, 2017; Kim & Mauborgne, 2005; Wilson, 2018).

Tools

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has access to multiple resources that has allowed it to take advantage of the blue ocean strategy (Mebert & Lowe, 2017).

• These resources Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect capabilities are internal as well as external for the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has also invested resources and trainings for developing internal capabilities and capacities for ensuring upgraded skills and increased value addition (Buchanan & Huczynski, 2019; Chernev, 2018).

Culture

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has a learning culture, and encourages all employees to ask questions and carry out healthy discussions (Anthony, 2021; Schein, 2010).

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has a culture that is focused on research and development, which in turn leads to new innovations and solutions for existing demands and challenges (Wunder, 2019).

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has an inclusive and diverse culture, which leads to increased synergies that allow the development and implementation of blue ocean strategies easily (Wilson, 2018).

Using the blue ocean strategy effectively: steps for successful implementation

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has developed the blue ocean strategy following systematic and organized processes and steps (Kim & Mauborgne, 2017). The steps that the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect undertook for developing the blue ocean strategy include:

Step1

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect conducted thorough market and industry research to identify the right place to work towards developing a core team (Kim & Mauborgne, 2014; Freedman, 2022). This core team was responsible for driving Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect forward strategically towards new value additions and differentiations (Blue Ocean Strategy, 2022; Kim & Mauborgne, 2017 b).

Step2

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect continued to conduct deep market analysis as well as studied and assessed the competition closely. This was needed by the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect to identify potential opportunities, and demand gaps in the existing industry as well as potential structural changes in the existing industrial boundaries (Blue Ocean Strategy, 2022).

Step3

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect’s assessment of the macro environment, and the market spaces allowed it to also identify the challenges and issues hidden in the current industry structure and design (Machado, 2019; Kim & Mauborgne, 2017 b). These issues and problems have restricted the industry size, and led to restrictive growth for the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect. The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect was also blue to identify new non-customers in this assessment- which could be turned into future consumers (Blue Ocean Strategy, 2022).

Step4

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect worked to redesign and reconstruct the industry boundaries and structures in a systematic manner. This was done through identifying new opportunities, as well as through exploring new innovations and valuations in existing offerings (Blue Ocean Strategy, 2022).

Step5

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect finally elected the right blue ocean move, i.e. conducted various pilot testing’s and market testing for its new offerings before finalizing and launching them in the market to attract new consumers, and explore new markets (Blue Ocean Strategy, 2022).

Tackling challenges on the way to Blue Ocean

Restructuring and reorganizing the boundaries and structures of the industries is not that simple (Anthony, 2021; Kim & Mauborgne, 2017 b). Managers and practitioners of the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect seek to renew the value of their offerings within the organization – mostly using new technologies and advances networks to not only create value propositions, but also transform existing ones (Kim & Mauborgne, 2005; Kim, 2002). However, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to overcome resistance towards change and innovation within the organization, as well as in the external environments, because of:

Organizational culture

The culture within the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect supports exploration and innovation. This culture is important for supporting the development and implementation of new ideas that boost the value propositions of the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect (Chernev, 2018; Bratton, 2020; Martinez, Beaulieu, & Gibbons, 2015).

Business design

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect also continually practices business design (Freedman, 2022). The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect ensures that it’s leading from the font. This means that the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect ensures that its teams are empowered, and confident in tackling ambiguous and difficult challenges and issues. This allows the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect to identify new opportunities and innovate (Wunder, 2019).

Strong and visionary leadership

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has a forward-thinking, progressive, charismatic leadership. This leadership ensures that the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect continually engages in disruptive processes and innovations – which in turn allow the company to explore and implement the blue ocean strategy. The leadership is supportive of, and facilitates the change processes within the company (Machado, 2019).

Communication

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect ensures that all communication within the organization is transparent and quick (Chernev, 2018; Buchanan & Huczynski, 2019). The leadership and management levels have frequent meetings within the company along managerial levels (Wilson, 2018; Wunder, 2019). This allows employees to feel on board of the happenings, and be part of a change from the beginning – understanding its need and facilitating its implementation. This is critical for ensuring successful innovation and adoption of the blue ocean strategy (Anthony, 2021; Chernev, 2018; Kim, 2002).

Value innovation in blue ocean strategy

Value innovation within the blue ocean strategy focuses on value as well as innovation (Blue Ocean Strategy, 2022; Kim & Mauborgne, 2017). This means that the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect seeks to innovate and create value at the same time as a means of differentiation within the marketplace to be able to implement the blue ocean strategy (Kim & Mauborgne, 2014). The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect does not only engage in value creation – which focuses on scaling the existing value only instead of creating a new one (Blue Ocean Strategy, 2022; Agnihotri, 2016; Kim & Mauborgne, 2014).

Technology innovation

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect engages in value innovation through technology innovation. The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect ensures that it uses advanced and progressive technology to address various consumer demands and problems as well as needs in innovative ways and manners (Kim & Mauborgne, 2005). However, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect ensures that it focuses on value innovation rather than technology innovation in its value propositions so that new value through technology is created for consumers (Kim, 2002; Wilson, 2018).

Low cost

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect also ensures affordability with value innovation. The value innovation allows the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect to operate at low costs, and maintain cost efficiencies (Chernev, 2018). As a result, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect maintains low costs and high value for consumers – allowing it to tap into new consumer groups as well. As a result, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect is able to enjoy a high growth rate as well as increased sales and profits (Kim & Mauborgne, 2014).

The strategies and strategic directions for designing and implementing the blue ocean strategy have been overseen through some guiding and fundamental principles by the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect. These include”

Formulation principles

Redesigning the industry

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect sought to reconstruct, redesign and rebuild the market boundaries and standards.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect was bold enough to redefine the industry space and the market space in which it operated (Mebert & Lowe, 2017).

Long term focus

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect focused on long-term success and sustainability, instead of short-term gains and numbers.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect was visionary, and aw beyond the existent customer demand and needs (Freedman, 2022).

Demand creation

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect creates demand for the new value-added offerings it manufactured and proposed in the blue oceans (Kim, 2002).

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect tapped into new customer groups and target audiences (Kim & Mauborgne, Red Ocean Traps (Harvard Business Review Classics), 2017 b).

Execution principles

Overcoming organizational challenges

Organizational culture

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has a result organizational culture (Martinez, Beaulieu, & Gibbons, 2015; Schein, 2010).

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect invests in research and development.

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect is quick to adapt to change and has a disciplined change management team to oversee change processes (Chernev, 2018; Kim & Mauborgne, 2014).

Environmental assessment

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect continually assesses its internal and external environments and creates contingency plans (Chernev, 2018; Machado, 2019).

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect engages in pre-strategic planning to help strengthen its strategic focus and direction (Wilson, 2018; Kim & Mauborgne, 2017 b).

Leadership

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has a visionary leadership (Bratton, 2020).

• The leadership at the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has a participative approach which encourages employee motivation and their organizational commitment.

• The leadership ensures optimal organizational performance at the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect (Freedman, 2022; Kim & Mauborgne, 2005).

Developing execution strategy

• The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has developed a sequential strategic direction for execution.

• The execution of the blue ocean strategy is based on market research (Anthony, 2021).

• The execution of the blue ocean strategy has been carefully planned to ensure that it’s timely.

• The execution involves all parts and members of the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect (The Economic Times, 2022; Kim, 2002).

Blue ocean strategic Tools

The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to use multiple operational and strategic tools.

Shift in organizational mindset

These tools kits have been important for the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect in helping it develop the right mindset needed for aligning processes and systems towards the blue ocean strategic direction (Kim & Mauborgne, 2017 b). The tools have been a powerful source for the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect in facilitating it towards aligning its resources, and identifying potential blue oceans (Kim, 2002). The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been diligent in ensuring that its teams and organizational members are familiar with the blue can strategies and tools so that the shift in their mindset is facilitated and strengthened (Wunder, 2019).

Cultural driver

Moreover, the tools also ensure increased alignment of the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect’s culture with the strategy. This, in turn, has allowed the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect to realize the increased number of opportunities, and embed creativity in its internal processes and systems (Kim, 2002; Buchanan & Huczynski, 2019).

These tools include, for example:

• Value innovation

• Six path framework

• Strategy canvas

• Four action framework

• Tipping point leadership

• ERRC Grid

• Pioneer settler migrator map

• Buyer utility map

• 3 tiers of non-customers

• Fair processes

• Visualizing strategy (The Economic Times, 2022)

Conclusion

With the use of the blue ocean strategy, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to redesign the industrial boundaries and standards using multiple techniques and tools that have been identified and discussed briefly in this paper.

The blue ocean strategy has been an important strategic element for the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect. The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to explore new markets and tap into new customer groups through using the blue ocean strategy. This has been possible for the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect through continuous investment in research and development as well as through its organizational cultural, which is focused on innovation and creativity. The Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has been able to make use of innovative processes and progressive technology to create value innovation. At the same time, the Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect has moved out of red oceans and no longer competes over pricing strategies. This has also allowed Accountability at the Top Executive Equity Ownership as an Alignment Mechanism in Times of Perceived Shareholder Neglect to build a cost advantage, and maintain affordability in its offerings for customers.

References

Agnihotri, A. (2016). Extending boundaries of blue ocean strategy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24 (6), 519-528.

Anthony, H. (2021). Understanding strategic management. New York: Oxford University Press.

Blue Ocean Strategy. (2022). WHAT IS BLUE OCEAN STRATEGY? Retrieved 2022, from Blue Ocean Strategy: https://www.blueoceanstrategy.com/what-is-blue-ocean-strategy/

Bratton, J. (2020). Organizational leadership. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.

Buchanan, D., & Huczynski, A. (2019). Organizational behaviour. London: Pearson UK.

Chernev, A. (2018). Strategic marketing management. Berlin/Heidelberg: Cerebellum Press.

Freedman, M. (2022). Blue Ocean Strategy: Creating Your Own Market . Retrieved 2022, from https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/5647-blue-ocean-strategy.html

Kim, W. (2002). Blue ocean strategy: from theory to practice. California management review, 47 (3), 105-121.

Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Value innovation: a leap into the blue ocean. Journal of business strategy .

Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (2014). Blue ocean strategy, expanded edition: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard business review Press.

Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (2017 b). Red Ocean Traps (Harvard Business Review Classics). Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.

Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (2017). Blue ocean leadership (Harvard business review classics). Boston, Massachusetts, United States: Harvard Business Review Press.

Machado, C. (2019). Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management. Berlin: Springer.

Martinez, E., Beaulieu, N., & Gibbons, R. (2015). Organizational culture and performance. American economic review, 105 (5), 331-35.

Mebert, A., & Lowe, S. (2017). Blue Ocean Strategy. Literary Criticism.

Schein, E. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

The Economic Times. (2022). What is 'Blue Ocean Strategy' . Retrieved 2022, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/blue-ocean-strategy

Wilson, F. (2018). Organizational behaviour and work: a critical introduction. New York: Oxford university press.

Wunder, T. (2019). Rethinking strategic management: Sustainable strategizing for positive impact. Berlin: Springer Nature.