Thank You!
Thank you for your email subscription. Check your email to get Coupon Code.
Marketing Strategy for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students
Posted by Addison on Mar-29-2023
Introduction
The report primarily focuses on the marketing strategy of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to give a reader an overview of the growth dynamics of the company. Recently, several strategic issues and managerial problems have been identified in marketing strategy of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students that have drawn the attention of the entire management to devise new marketing strategies that can help the company to resolve the problems to continue its expansion and future growth to achieve a competitive edge in the marketplace. This report is written to provide Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students marketing strategy with the required strategic solutions using multiple frameworks and tools.
External Environmental Analysis
PESTLE Analysis is the most popular strategic tool that is used by many organizations when conducting an external environmental analysis. This framework typically focuses on political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors that can impact the macro environment of the business (Zalengera, E.Blanchard, & C.Eames, 2014).
Political factors
Political Stability
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students operates in a politically stable environment, which means that it provides the company with more friendly and stable business growth opportunities (Christodoulou & Cullinane, 2019). However, since Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students operates in multiple countries, there are high chances of various political tensions that can cause instability in market growth trends for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. This can limit the company's growth opportunities.
Pressure Groups
Moreover, it is important for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to analyze and monitor the activities of pressure groups. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can create a close collaboration with these groups to achieve long-term goals.
Corruption and Changing Policies
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students must keep a close check on the changes in any government policies because they can directly impact the performance of the business. The operations of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are its different countries can become unpredictable if there is a high level of corruption and weak enforcement of the law (Achinas, Horjus, & Achinas, 2019).
Trade and Taxes
The profitability of a company is directly influenced if there are high taxes in a country. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should look into the taxation policies in each country before further expanding its operations (Eierle, Hartlieb, & C. Hay, 2022). Similarly, if there are high trade restrictions, it can get difficult for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to import and export its products, impacting the relationships with trade partners.
Economic factors
GDP, Employment, and Exchange Rates
The long-term growth strategies of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are majorly determined by the GDP growth of the economy. The purchasing power of consumers significantly increases with a high GDP. High unemployment in an economy shows that Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can benefit from surplus labor with low-cost wages. Furthermore, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should monitor interest rates as it can affect the borrowing ability. With that being said, if there is a high fluctuation in currency, the profitability of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can also be influenced (Sadeghi, 2020).
Labor Market
It is important for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to make appropriate predictions regarding the labor market conditions in a specific economy (Sadeghi, 2020). This can help the company to hire a more talented workforce that can improve the performance of the company.
Industry lifecycle stage
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should consider expanding its operations in growing economies to benefit from growth opportunities. It can be challenging for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to enter a mature industry at a growing stage (Villamarín & Pinzon, 2017).
Social factors
Demographics
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should study the changing patterns of demographics, such as socio-economic variables, the aging population, and trends in migration (Barbara & Cortis, 2017). This can help the company to identify the right segment to target with a high potential for growth opportunities.
Cultural norms
Every country and society has a distinctive culture with different norms and values. It is important for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to study and identify social class stratification.
E-commerce
There has been a significant shift in online shopping. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students needs to adopt necessary changes considering the growing use of social media networking sites and mobile phones to increase its revenue and overall profitability (Villamarín & Pinzon, 2017).
Technological factors
Technological innovations
On-going technological innovations should be considered carefully by Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students so that it can stay ahead of the competitive market. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should continue working on introducing major technological transformations to achieve a competitive advantage (Rastogi & TRIVEDI, 2016).
Social Media Marketing
The collaboration with consumers has been growing rapidly because of the development of communication technologies (Rastogi & TRIVEDI, 2016). Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can take it as a great opportunity where can use innovative strategies to expand its customer base.
Environmental factors
Waste Management
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should implement the latest technological tools to minimize environmental pollution. Waste management is now getting popular and has been considered a major business norm (Igliński, Iglińska, & Cichosz, 2016).
Climatic Conditions and Eco-friendly products
Climatic conditions can influence the efficiency of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. The cost of a company's operations can be increased if there are extreme weather conditions. Similarly, there has been an increasing demand for eco-friendly products. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should work towards adopting more sustainable business practices to gain customer trust (Barkauskas, Barkauskienė, & Jasinskas, 2015).
Legal factors
Employee protection laws
It is important for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to follow the health and safety laws for its employees that are issued by the authorities to ensure the safety of its labor.
Consumer laws
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should protect its customer data to ensure their security and privacy concerns. Moreover, it should set the right price with the right product quality (Igliński, Iglińska, & Cichosz, 2016).
Porter's Five Forces
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can use Porter's Five Forces to analyze the competitive landscape of the industry. The strategic planners of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can use this framework to make effective decisions.
Threat of New Entrants
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students operates in an industry where it is difficult to achieve economies of scale, making it difficult for new entrants to enter the industry (Yunna & Yisheng, 2014). There is a strong product differentiation with high capital requirements. Moreover, it is difficult to establish a distribution network easily in this industry. Thus, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has a weak threat of new entrants.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
There are more suppliers in the industry of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. This shows that there is less control over prices. Organizations like Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can easily switch to other suppliers because of less differentiation in products. This makes the bargaining power of suppliers a weak force in Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students's industry (H. Th. Bruijl, 2018).
Bargaining Power of Buyers
The industry in which Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students operates has many suppliers as companies to buyers. This means that buyers have fewer options and do not have control over prices (H. Th. Bruijl, 2018). The high product differentiation shows that there are few alternative products for buyers, and there is a high switching cost. This makes the bargaining power of buyers a weak force in the industry.
Threat of Substitute Products and Services
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students operates in an industry that offers very few substitutes to its customers. The substitutes that are available are expensive because of their high quality (Zhao, Zuo, & Wu, 2016). However, companies like Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students sell their products at a lower prices. This clearly shows that buyers may feel reluctant when switching to other substitutes.
Rivalry Among Existing Firms
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students operates in a less competitive industry. The already established companies have a large market share, meaning that any move by the existing companies will be noticed. Moreover, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has to take several competitive actions to become a market leader, as the industry is likely to grow rapidly in the coming years (Aithal, 2020).
SWOT Analysis
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can make use of SWOT analysis to effectively analyze the company's internal strengths, weaknesses, external opportunities, and threats.
Strengths
Strong distribution network
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students operates in various countries and has multiple outlets that help the company to deliver its products quickly to its customers. This shows that Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has a strong distribution network (Benzaghta, Elwalda, & Mousa, 2021).
Financial position
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has established itself as a strong financial company over the past few years. It has generated enough profits that can be used to finance any future expenditure (Basset & Mohamed, 2018).
Automation
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has adopted the latest and innovative technology in its business operations, which has allowed the company to reduce its production costs (Benzaghta, Elwalda, & Mousa, 2021).
Social media presence
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has been successful in establishing itself as a strong brand on social media platforms that, includes Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. This increases customer engagement (Basset & Mohamed, 2018).
Weaknesses
High rent costs
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has its manufacturing plants on rented properties. This increases the company's overall costs, and a significant portion of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students's profits go into paying the rent (Comino & Ferretti, 2016).
Research and Development
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has not been able to conduct effective and in-depth market research regarding new markets and products (Comino & Ferretti, 2016). Customer trends are always evolving, and it is important for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to take immediate action in conducting its research.
Centralized Power
There has been a centralized decision-making process in Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. This means that employees have to consult their managers before taking any decision themselves. This slow down the decision-making process. and employees feel demotivated. Thus, impacting the operations of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students (Comino & Ferretti, 2016).
Opportunities
Presence of Internet
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has a great opportunity of expanding its business by using the internet. Since there has been a growing trend in online shopping Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can boost its sales by expanding its online stores (Yan, Xia, & X.H.Bao, 2015). Additionally, social media platforms can be updated constantly to engage customers with all the new products introduced by Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students.
Technological Innovations
Technology is constantly evolving, and Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can benefit from it by implementing the technology in its various departments. Manufacturing process can be completed automated, which can eventually help Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to reduce its costs (Taghavifard, Mahdiraji, & Alibakhshi, 2018).
Globalization
The continuous increase in globalization has allowed Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to expand its business operations across borders. It has the opportunity of entering new markets (Yan, Xia, & X.H.Bao, 2015).
Threats
New Entrants
Recently, many companies are entering the industry in which Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students operates. This means that there are chances of increased competition. This poses a threat to Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students as it has to put more effort into gaining market share (Taghavifard, Mahdiraji, & Alibakhshi, 2018).
Fluctuations in exchange rates
The exchange rates are highly subjected to fluctuations that negatively impact the sales of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students needs to study the changing fluctuations to keep up with its profitability (Vlados & Chatzinikolaou, 2019).
Consumer trends
The consumer trends are constantly changing, that causes changes in their demands. This puts pressure on companies like Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students, who have to continuously meet their consumer demands. Moreover, there is a significant threat from substitute products because consumers tend to switch to these companies (Vlados & Chatzinikolaou, 2019).
Marketing Mix
Product
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students operates in a wider range of products. Each of the products has its further product lines that are sold under the Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. This means that customers can benefit from a large variety of products. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students sells highly differentiated products with higher quality that, gives it a competitive edge (Khan, 2014).
Price
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students follows a competitive pricing strategy. The company also takes into account all its costs before setting its prices (Londhe, 2014). Currently, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students is using a product bundle pricing strategy where customers get bundled products at lower prices.
Place
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has adopted various distribution channels to reach its customers. The company sells its products through its website directly (Thabit & Raewf, 2018). Apart from this, it also distributes its products to wholesalers, who then further sell it to small retailers. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has its own retail stores where it sells its products directly to consumers.
Promotion
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students uses traditional and modern promotional techniques. TV ads are used to reach a larger audience. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students also advertises on social media sites such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Events are sponsored by the company. Moreover, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students participates in several exhibitions (Londhe, 2014).
VRIO Analysis
Valuable
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students engages in corporate social responsibility activities. This has allowed the company to establish a strong brand image. Since, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has a well-established distribution network, the products are reached to consumers in a timely manner. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has been able to introduce innovation in its various departments, which has lowered its costs (Ariyani & Daryanto, 2018).
Rare
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students operates in multiple countries. This means that its global presence is a rare factor. It works towards an organizational culture that encourages teamwork, and creativity among employees (Ariyani & Daryanto, 2018). Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students is also able to adapt to different societies, and cultures due to its exposure to various locations.
Inimitable
The products produced by Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students are of a high quality. Customers make repetitive purchases, and thus it is an inimitable source. (Miethlich & G. Oldenburg, 2019). Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students has a significant placement of its stores that gives an easy access to its customers. Additionally, the company has been using a competitive pricing strategy because it has been able to achieve economies of scale, thus lower production costs.
Organization
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students, over the years, has successfully gained a financial strength. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can make use of these finances to invest in major acquisitions that give it more growth opportunities. The advancements in technology have allowed Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to manage its operations more effectively. Distribution channels are another resource for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. The supply chain is very efficient, resulting in more revenue (Miethlich & G. Oldenburg, 2019).
Value Chain Analysis
Primary Activities
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students is involved in primary activities such as the production of goods and then selling them to the target audience.
Inbound Logistics
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should ensure to have a strong relationship with its suppliers to avoid any inconvenience in receiving, storing, and distributing the product. This will help Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to have a more effective transformation of a product (Ariwibowo & Saputro, 2021).
Operations
Operations involves manufacturing as well as services. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should conduct an in-depth analysis of its operational activities to remain ahead of its competitors (M.El-Sayed, W.Dickson, & O.El-Naggar, 2015). This will increase the productivity of the company, and more profits can be generated.
Outbound Logistics
It is important for Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to analyze, and optimize its outbound logistics so that it is able to achieve the long-term corporate goals. Managing outbound activities properly reduces the chance of late deliveries (M.El-Sayed, W.Dickson, & O.El-Naggar, 2015).
Marketing and Sales
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should use various marketing and sales techniques to differentiate its products from its competitors. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can adopt marketing and sales activities such as promotional activities, advertising, and building strong relationships with suppliers and customers (Ariwibowo & Saputro, 2021).
Services
In terms of services, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students must ensure that it provides its customers with the pre-sale and post-sale services (Jaligot, C.Wilson, & R.Cheeseman, 2016). The post-sale service typically falls into the promotional activities of a company. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can thus develop its customer loyalty.
Secondary Activities
Firm infrastructure
A strong infrastructure of a firm can enable Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to optimize the entire value chain of the company. Moreover, by controlling the infrastructure activities, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can be in a better position to get a strong foothold in the competitive marketplace (Darmawan & Wiguna, 2014).
Human Resource Management
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should place its major focus on analyzing the different aspects of HR, such as recruitment, selection, training, and performance evaluation of employees (Darmawan & Wiguna, 2014). Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can reduce its costs by identifying and analyzing the costs associated with hiring and training.
Procurement
Procurement is an important element in the Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students's value chain. It is important for the company to assess its overall procurement activities so that the inbound, outbound, and operational activities can be optimized (Kumar & P. V., 2016).
Ansoff's Matrix
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can implement Ansoff's Matrix to make decisions regarding its business growth. This framework includes four different strategic choices that can be selected by Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students.
Market Penetration
Production capacity
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can increase its overall production capacity. This will allow the company to reach more wider audience in an existing market. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can also benefit from the reduced costs by expanding its production capacity. Thus, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can attract more customers using competitive pricing (Madsen, 2017).
Marketing Investment
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can penetrate the market by investing more in marketing and sales activities. This will help the company to engage with its customer more effectively, leading to more potential customers (Dawes, 2020).
Distribution Channels
Innovative and unique distribution channels can be explored by Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. This will enable the company to reach new segments and groups of customers (Dawes, 2020). In addition to this, Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can penetrate the market by improving its supply chain, giving more accessibility to customers.
Joint Ventures/Acquisitions
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can enter into joint ventures or can take over other leading companies of the market. This will give Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students more market share.
Market Development
Research & Development
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should keep on investing in its R&D department, so it is able to identify the changing trends of the market. This will help Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to target the right market at the right time (Mukangai & Murigi, 2021).
Expanding Regionally
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can enter in a new market by expanding its operations regionally. This includes considering different cities of the country. Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students must consider any cultural differences when entering a new market (Mukangai & Murigi, 2021).
New Segments
New segments of the current market can be explored (Mukangai & Murigi, 2021). Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can add new features and product uses to its existing products that satisfies the needs of a different customer segment.
Product Development
Modifications
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can modify the existing product by improving its features to enhance the product offerings.
Launching additional products
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students should invest in its R&D department so it can come up with new and innovative products that attracts and fulfill the needs of the target audience. This will boost the sales of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students and will increase profitability (Khajezadeh, Niasar, & Asli, 2019).
Diversification
Vertical Integration
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can consider vertical integration. This will allow Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to develop and launch new products that are similar to its existing product category (Khajezadeh, Niasar, & Asli, 2019).
Horizontal Integration
Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can diversify its business operation using horizontal integration. This means that the new products and services of Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students will not be related to its current products (Dhir & Dhir, 2015).
A new business diversification
Entering into a completely new business can be considered by Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students. The organization can work towards starting a new business that can give a company more growth prospects in the future (Dhir & Dhir, 2015). Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can conglomerate with the help of mergers and acquisitions.
Conclusion
To conclude, it could be said that Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can resolve its current managerial and strategic problems by focusing on its existing products. The company can adopt more attractive marketing strategies that can help Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students to boost its revenue and profitability. It is recommended to focus on maintaining strong supplier relationships. Moreover, it is also advised to focus on more innovative products so Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students can remain competitive in the market.
References
Achinas, S., Horjus, J., & Achinas, V. (2019). A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe. Sustainability, 11(24), 5981.
Aithal, P. S. (2020). Study on Student-generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students Analysis Technique for Business Models, Business Strategies, Operating Concepts & Business Systems. International Journal in Management and Social Science, 95-115.
Ariwibowo, P., & Saputro, F. B. (2021). Analysis of Strength & Weakness, Using the Concept of Resource-Based View with the VRIO Framework in Sharia Cooperatives. Jurnal Manajemen Strategi Dan Aplikasi Bisnis, 279 - 294.
Ariyani, W., & Daryanto, A. (2018). Operationalization of Internal Analysis Using the VRIO Framework: Development of Scale for Resource and Capabilities Organization (Case Study: XYZ Company Animal Feed Business Unit). Asian Business Research Journal, 9–14.
Barbara, C., & Cortis, D. (2017). The European Insurance Industry: A PEST Analysis. International Journal of Financial Studies, 5(2), 14.
Barkauskas, V., Barkauskienė, K., & Jasinskas, E. (2015). Analysis of Macro Environmental Factors Influencing the Development of Rural Tourism: Lithuanian Case. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167-172.
Basset, M. A., & Mohamed, M. (2018). An Extension of Neutrosophic AHP–SWOT Analysis for Strategic Planning and Decision-Making. Symmetry, 10(4), 18.
Benzaghta, ,. M., Elwalda, A., & Mousa, M. M. (2021). SWOT analysis applications: An integr T analysis applications: An integrative literature review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 55-73.
Christodoulou, A., & Cullinane, K. (2019). Identifying the Main Opportunities and Challenges from the Implementation of a Port Energy Management System: A SWOT/PESTLE Analysis. Sustainability, 11(21), 6046.
Comino, E., & Ferretti, V. (2016). Indicators-based spatial SWOT analysis: Supporting the strategic planning and management of complex territorial systems. Ecological Indicators, 1104-1117.
Darmawan, M. A., & Wiguna, B. (2014). Value chain analysis for green productivity improvement in the natural rubber supply chain: a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201-211.
Dawes, J. (2020). The Ansoff Matrix: A Legendary Tool, But with Two Logical Problems. SSRN.
Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2015). Diversification: Literature Review and Issues. Wiley Online Library.
Eierle, B., Hartlieb, S., & C. Hay, D. (2022). External Factors and the Pricing of Audit Services: A Systematic Review of the Archival Literature Using a PESTLE Analysis. A Journal of Practice & Theory, 95–119.
H. Th. Bruijl, D. G. (2018). The Relevance of Porter's Five Forces in Today's Innovative and Changing Business Environment. SSRN.
Igliński, B., Iglińska, A., & Cichosz, M. (2016). Renewable energy production in the Łódzkie Voivodeship. The PEST analysis of the RES in the voivodeship and in Poland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 737-750.
Jaligot, R., C.Wilson, D., & R.Cheeseman, C. (2016). Applying value chain analysis to informal sector recycling: A case study of the Zabaleen. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 80-91.
Khajezadeh, M., Niasar, M. S., & Asli, S. A. (2019). Application of Neural Network in Portfolio Product Companies: Integration of Boston Consulting Group Matrix and Ansoff Matrix. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 13(6), 809-813.
Khan, D. M. (2014). The Concept of ‘Marketing Mix’ and its Elements. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 16(2), 95-107.
Kumar, D., & P. V., R. (2016). Value Chain: A Conceptual Framework. International Jorunal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 74-77.
Londhe, B. (2014). Marketing Mix for Next Generation Marketing. Procedia Economics and Finance, 335-340.
M.El-Sayed, A.-F., W.Dickson, M., & O.El-Naggar, G. (2015). Value chain analysis of the aquaculture feed sector in Egypt. Aquaculture, 92-101.
Madsen, D. Ø. (2017). Not Dead Yet: The Rise, Fall and Persistence of the BCG Matrix. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19-34 .
Miethlich, B., & G. Oldenburg, A. (2019). The Employment of Persons with Disabilities as a Strategic Asset: A Resource-Based-View using the Value-Rarity-Imitability-Organization (VRIO) Framework. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business and Economics, 1-13.
Mukangai, W. I., & Murigi, E. M. (2021). The Effect of Market Development on Sales Performance of Agro-Based Dealers in Nairobi City County, Kenya. Journal of Marketing and Communication, 4(1), 23-35.
Rastogi, N., & TRIVEDI, D. (2016). Pestle Technique- A Tool to Identify External Risks in Construction Projects. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(1), 385-388.
Sadeghi, V. a. (2020). The motivational factors of business venturing: Opportunity versus necessity? A gendered perspective on European countries. Journal of Business Research, 279-289.
Taghavifard, M. T., Mahdiraji, H. A., & Alibakhshi, A. M. (2018). An Extension of Fuzzy SWOT Analysis: An Application to Information Technology. Information, 9(3), 46.
Thabit, T., & Raewf, M. (2018). The Evaluation of Marketing Mix Elements: A Case Study. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(4), 100 - 109.
Villamarín, J. M., & Pinzon, B. D. (2017). Key Success Factors to Business Intelligence Solution Implementation. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 48-69.
Vlados, C., & Chatzinikolaou, D. (2019). Towards a Restructuration of the Conventional SWOT Analysis. Business and Management Studies, 76-84.
Yan, J., Xia, F., & X.H.Bao, H. (2015). Strategic planning framework for land consolidation in China: A top-level design based on SWOT analysis. Habitat International, 46-54.
Yunna, W., & Yisheng, Y. (2014). The competition situation analysis of shale gas industry in China: Applying Porter’s five forces and scenario model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 798-805.
Zalengera, C., E.Blanchard, R., & C.Eames, P. (2014). Overview of the Malawi energy situation and A PESTLE analysis for sustainable development of renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 335-347.
Zhao, Z. Y., Zuo, J., & Wu, P. H. (2016). Competitiveness assessment of the biomass power generation industry in China: A five forces model study. Renewable Energy, 144-153.
Related Article
- PESTEL Analysis of Student generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students
- Hofstede Cultural Model of Student generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students
- Net Present Value (NPV) Analysis of Student generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students
- Marketing Mix (4Ps) Analysis of Student generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students
- Corporate Social Responsibility of Student generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students
- Student generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
- VRIO Analysis of Student generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students
- Student generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students Case Solution
- Blue Ocean Strategy of Student generated Intellectual Property Perceptions of Ownership by Faculty and Students
Latest Feedback
Hudson Joel
Verified
Only a minor point was missed in the assignment but I decided to call this cheap paper writing service for the modification because the revision was totally free. They provided the best result and I’m well pleased with them!
Shura Kanth
Verified
100% right to appoint this service and the money extremely right to spend here. It's awesome with a bit of charge to get A or A+. Fully recommended!
Ryan Logan
Verified
I extremely needed a discount and found this service whose discounts were satisfactory. I’ve been getting assignments from it for three years.
Alice Filippo
Verified
I ordered a research paper here and they issued it according to my requirements. Highly recommended!
Pawan Chauhan
Verified
Thank you very much! The assignment is looking very great and I’m sure that the teacher will like it too.
Ella Leo
Verified
The support representative was very patient with me. Now, I’ll just order this service and keep myself entertained with movies.
Calculate the Price of Your Order
Next Article
- Motivating At-risk Students in the Arkansas Delta: An Entrepreneurship Simulation Marketing Strategy
- Constructing an Innovative Model of Entrepreneurship Education Through Regional Collaboration Marketing Strategy
- New Venture Assessment: Moving Beyond Business Plans in Introductory Entrepreneurship Courses Marketing Strategy
- Entrepreneurial versus Organizational Employment Preferences: A Comparative Study of European and American Respondents Marketing Strategy
- Entrepreneurially-minded Undergraduate Business Students' Educational Preferences Marketing Strategy
- Development and Initiation of an Online Master of Science Degree in Economic Development and Entrepreneurship Marketing Strategy
- International Entrepreneurship: The Influence of Culture on Teaching and Learning Styles Marketing Strategy
- Developing Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Student Business Marketing Strategy
- Experiential Entrepreneurship in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Methods on Entrepreneurial Career Choice Intentions Marketing Strategy
- Is Non-traditional Entrepreneurship Training Helpful to Nascent Entrepreneurs? Yes and No Marketing Strategy
Previuos Article
- Making the Case Marketing Strategy
- Joe Smith's Closing Analysis (B) Marketing Strategy
- Joe Smith's Closing Analysis (A), Spanish Version Marketing Strategy
- GMAC: The Pipeline Marketing Strategy
- On Writing Teaching Notes Well Marketing Strategy
- Exxon Corp.: Trouble at Valdez Marketing Strategy
- Ashland Oil, Inc.: Trouble at Floreffe (A) Marketing Strategy
- Ashland Oil, Inc.: Trouble at Floreffe (B) Marketing Strategy
- Ashland Oil, Inc.: Trouble at Floreffe (C) Marketing Strategy
- Ashland Oil, Inc.: Trouble at Floreffe (D) Marketing Strategy
Be a great writer or hire a greater one!
Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire EssayPandas with BIG enough reputation.
Our Guarantees
- Quality assured
- Proof of no plagiarism
- Qualified writers
- Data security
- 24/7 support
- On time delivery
Interesting Fact
Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!
Order Now